Who do you side with on the sea of Japan naming dispute?

Who do you side with on the sea of Japan naming dispute?
Obviously, Japan. Koreans are a bunch of crybabies.

Attached: seaofjapan-01.png (845x845, 280.45K)

Clearly its the sea of russia

East of what?

East Sea.

Don't you have a different name for the English Channel?

do Koreans call the Yellow Sea the West Sea?
or are they obsessed only with the Sea of Japan?

>english channel
You mean the Norman Passage?

It would just be another part of the Pacific Ocean if Japan wasn't there so it should be named after Japan

Obviously it's the Sea of Japan
I'd also call the North Sea "Germanic Sea" but it's too autistic to do so

Sea of Palestine

In the US its called the East Sea

I think it's called Sea of Japan here.

The Baltic Sea is already called "east sea" in my country and nobody has a bitter dispute about it.

But Finland doesn't have the same painful history with the Baltic States like Korea and Japan have.

Japan has more coastline on it, therefore more of a claim. Korea can fuck off.

Japan lost so it's the east sea, simple as.

Japan is Anglo Clay. Japs can migrate to China.

Every attempted Mongol invasion of Japan was launched by Korean ships, with mostly Korean leadership, and mostly Korean and Han soldiers.
The Yamato themselves are Korean, and genocided the original Japanese.
Just get over it

Sea of Japan makes the most sense because if you removed the Japanese archipelago, it would just be the north Pacific.
Koeans are insufferable crybaby cunts when it comes to this. They harass every geographic organization about this endlessly.

We have our French name for it, but no one disputed its English name

>Japan

Attached: 1.png (512x583, 502.98K)

Yeah and they already got Korea Strait. Is it really end of the world if the sea is named after Japan?

Sea of japan, bot because its the only reason its not just part of the pacific and they're the only one who had any history of conquest around the entire area.