How can a country with such a powerful military be so weak in a country like Ukraine? This fucking map hasn't changed since March. There is clearly more going on here
How can a country with such a powerful military be so weak in a country like Ukraine...
Other urls found in this thread:
voltairenet.org
twitter.com
>There is clearly more going on here
Or Any Forums is retarded in thinking that the only way to win a war is to blitzkrieg and evaporate the enemy in 2 weeks
Whatever answer you're gonna get is gonna be Ukrainian/NATO or Russian cope.
Truth is that Russia got itself in to a difficult place.
They could go HAM and grind troops and equipment against the border until they give but they want to have an army leftover when they're done.
So at the moment they're playing a long economic game to try and make NATO countries drop support for Ukraine by restricting resources.
Whether this will work, we don't know yet.
Also Russians have a lot of equipment but it's very dated, Russia hasn't had the money to update it's military since the fall of the USSR.
Meanwhile Ukraine is receiving excellent equipment from multiple NATO countries along with military intelligence advice to keep them one step ahead of Russia.
Right now, Putin probably realises that his plan of having Ukraine demilitarise or installing a friendly regime isn't going to happen. But if he plays his cards right, he might make NATO nations suffer enough to put pressure on Ukraine to do a peace deal where they pull out of the eastern regions.
Ukraine has the largest army in Europe.
If you want to win a war, yes you need to take land and destroy the enemy. This is not what winning looks like.
>bunker down for 8 years
>unlimited nato weapons, intel and training
>2 million troops drafted
>vs russia's 200k and mostly artillery tactics
its been a meat grinder for ukraine but they're slowing Russia down at least.
>map hasn't changed since March
You're making an assumption that it is supposed to change.
The goals of the SMO are to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine, and they are doing that. The goal was never to take over Ukraine
Just keep one thing in perspective, if this was war only between Russia and Ukraine, Russia would took whole of Ukraine in 2-3 months, not only Eastern parts.
But this is a war between Russia-Ukraine-NATO.
NATO supplying not only military hardware to Ukrain, but also satellite images of Russian positions.
Considering all this, Russia is doing very well, and eventually Russia will win this war.
No questions about it.
>Oh no why haven't they taken all of the land and have to fight urban insurgents for years to come instead of just taking the Russian majority lands and consolidate their hold onto it.
this. but plebbitors and the press want to blow everything out of proportion and make it look like ww3 all for profits and views.
Are you a ukraine citizen living in the uk?
Appear weak when strong, and appear strong when weak
Why should Russia do anything when the West is destroying themselves over the failed state of Ukraine?
Russia are clearly incapable of winning militarily, don't buy the probably actual bots in these threads that insist that Russia never actually planned on successfully swarming and seizing large masses of territory.
That said, Russia are still in a decent defensive position against Europe now. They need to hold Donbas at all costs and wait until Western Europe goes into winter, then they will be able to negotiate their way out of a loss. Russia will get Donetsk and Luhansk republics but that's it.
Everybody involved in this stupid war has egg on their face, we are lucky that China is currently being retarded instead of capitalising
Go back to playing hearts of iron dumb nigger
Nigger you're showing a picture of the land they're taking. How do you people breathe?
>This fucking map hasn't changed since March.
Because the war was over in march. Glownigger anglokike media wants us to believe the war is still going on so billions can be spent in "aiding" the ukranian front
Source: voltairenet.org
...yes, and he is married to his Paki boyfriend.
It's almost as if they're slow-rolling the war on purpose so that it will drag into winter and cause Europe to collapse from populist uprisings. Russia is winning, because NATO is going to collapse from within.
Wars of attrition are fought against stronger enemies when you don't have a choice otherwise.
Not between Russia and Russia's Canada.
There should be no grinding offensive between Russia and Ukraine if Russia was at all competent.
>If you want to win a war, yes you need to take land and destroy the enemy. This is not what winning looks like.
Ukraine has sustained 300k casualties. You reddit /k/ope midwit tards don't know anything about wafare. Just shut up and leave it to the grown-ups ike Scott Ritter who will tell you that Russia is not only winning, but it was certain that Russia would win from the start. Ukraine never stood a chance, and only /k/ope midwits like you are dumb enough to think Ukraine ever even stood a chance.
>Be UK
>Get btfo in Afghanistan
>Get btfo in Egypt
Get fucked in the ass.