Seatbelts

Why are seatbelts a thing that people are so passionate about? It’s the weirdest thing to me, and one law that makes no sense. The only arguments I’ve heard (about how it effects anyone but but you) is that you could “become a projectile and injure someone else” which is fucking absurd.
People will get upset over the issue. “I had a family member who died cause they weren’t wearing a seatbelt >:@“ alright well I don’t go telling fat people that my aunt died of a heart attack from being obese.
I feel like seatbelts and the way the issue was presented back in the day by the news/media was one of the greatest psyops.
(Car seat/seatbelt laws for minors make sense cause you’re responsible for their safety. But giving a ticket to an adult who chooses not to wear a seatbelt is an insane concept).

Attached: E1232D95-C2FF-4054-AED4-88B47E2F4F73.jpg (1072x712, 154.44K)

I’m here looking for it one good argument in defence of seatbelt laws (for adults)

So crimescene cleaners have less brains and meat crayon to clean its total laziness.

Try crashing into something without seatbelts, preferably at higher speeds
Should be fun

idk sucks to be you lol

When you injur yourself, especially in a country like ours with public health care, you are affecting more than just yourself in resources and labor. The ambulance, the hospital visit, the medical care, the medical supplies, or even just the guy who's paid to scrub your brains off the pavement. All of these are resources paid by the public. That is the argument for why others want to force you to take a precaution to minimize it.

I dont wear my seat belt
And i never fucking will
Dont care hope i die
Thanks jews
Heil Hitler
Sage
Sage
Sages
Sage
Fuck you

The amount of laws they could implement because healthcare is insane. Liquor stores and fast food joints on every corner cause lifelong chronic conditions, and my one owie no seatbelt car accident is gonna be a huge burden on taxpayers. Not a good argument

Brain dead take….
>no seatbelt=dead
>seatbelt=injured

Which one costs the public more?

?
Doesn’t justify a law

It is a good argument, and you've failed to refute it.

>that people are so passionate about?
your premise is false

BAN CARS!

The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where feed and seed both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Feeduck and Seeduck".

Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's). Also, "Bart's Fart & Shart" doesn't make any sense because the store wasn't called "Feed & Sheed" under Sneed's ownership so stop posting it.

Sneed sells feed and seed. Chuck on the other hand, sells suck and fuck.

Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)

Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's). Also, "Bart's Fart & Shart" doesn't make any sense because the store wasn't called "Feed & Sheed" under Sneed's ownership so stop posting it.

Amazing the way this board is so full of contrarians that you have a leaf here saying "uh y seatbelts good" Go drive into oncoming traffic without one and see what happens

Seat belt= no injury in minor crash
No seat belt = potential injury in minor crash.

No seat belt objectively costs public more over all situations

Not wearing seatbelts, is incentive not to crash. Be based and redpilled, bros

So make a law for everything that could be a burden on the healthcare system? See a kid climbing a tree, give them a fine because “you might break your arm, son. Can’t be using up that taxpayer money.” If you really believe that’s a good justification for making a law then damn yeah it ogre bros
Unless you’re just doubling down. Which, again, why are people so passionately for seatbelt laws

>one of the greatest psyops
YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT FUCKING SEATBELTS
GET
A
GRIP
NIGGER

Complete whataboutism. I've given you the argument you asked for about seatbelts and you can't refute it. Thread is over.

This thread will prove it lol

>The only arguments I’ve heard (about how it effects anyone but but you) is that you could “become a projectile and injure someone else” which is fucking absurd.
If you watch the rekt threads /gif/ you will see that this is not absurd. Bodies being thrown out of cars in a crash is very common and they become wrecking balls.

Even minor crashes cause injury whiplash is extremely common in low speed crashes. Even at 30mph if u get ejected especially in a rollover or head on your chances of dying are very high, while staying in the seat even in a 20mph crash is def gonna cause whiplash.

Better stand by it then

Please keep driving without a seatbelt leaf.

you are afraid of driving. It is ok to admit it. It can be scary I know. If only you had a father with his head on straight enough to teach his faggot leaning doll playing son how to operate and care for a vehicle, you wouldn't need to resort to making contrarian points your lifestyle and personality on top of your already suspect cartoon and vidya addiction

Attached: 1660693099858135.webm (640x480, 1.46M)

People love their seatbelts so much lol

I'm aware, that doesn't refute my point

The law is trying to protect you from your ignorant ass self who won't wear one. I'm also against this law because there's a higher chance you will kill yourself

dumb mutt can't into IDs