How powerful would we become, if we were allowed 100 years of fascism

How powerful would we become, if we were allowed 100 years of fascism

Attached: 1661972627056.jpg (648x590, 52.36K)

Ayyys tremble at the thought

You would be fake and gay

We would fail without the help of ancient Negro science. Only African Egyptian super minds have the power to conquer the universe. Be good and let your wife fuck BBC, you white racist devil piece of shit racist wore.

>powerful
>if allowed
youve missed the plot op

>OP acts like this never happened
Rome, motherfucker.

we need upright people of good stock first. at least upright

Attached: 1658999593641376.gif (300x194, 3.24M)

If we had an Alexander, Caesar, Napoleon, Hitler type of leader then we could achieve imperium of man tier
Any thing less though it would probably just turn into a shithole, for fascism to work it requires a leader who is the embodiment of the nation itself. A very rare figure in history which shows up every few centuries.

Authoritarian regimes only breeds poverty, corruption. slavery and ignorance. Well if you consider that "power"...

only if people are shit

I dunno. Only a few years of (((fascism))) resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Whites, the permanent cuckening of Europe, the extinction of the White race and the creation of the state of Israel.

so don't chimp out, or else world's jews will fuck you up. embrace doom, yes?

nah, it was the anglo and his fear of losing the empire combined with kike money

outcome would be just getting defeated by a stronger and a more free and democratic power
just like how the spanish and also the ottomans fell off because of being weaker compared to the more progressive french and british empires,germany and italy getting crushed in ww2 is another good example

public transport to moon

yes,

moon bus

the causation is inverse
highly intelligent and cultured societies always favour democracy and freedom. When education en social capital decline, they tend to favour authoritarianism and restriction.

Thats the case of ancient greece, rome, Islamic Golden Age, etc etc

exactly

four hundred times. there are ways to get over nine thousand though.

Then it implies it is less about the system of governance and more about the leader at the helm, and if that is the case, then the best multiplier of a head at the system, be it religious or concise, is monarchy.

in nature there's hierarchy. you can't have everyone be at the same level and expect somsething

democracy is the rich having fun