Why does the walkable city scare the American so much while they're just common sense to Europeans and East Asians?
Why does the walkable city scare the American so much while they're just common sense to Europeans and East Asians?
Dumb question. American niggers are more rowdy than English niggers. Simple as.
this is just a slide thread disguised as what if you died in a car accident in suburban area thread.
Because 'walkable cities' are things you had to have because you had barely any land to claim for your own, and a lot of infrastructure built around you and horses for hundreds of years. Plus car companies fucked up public transport, so people just drove to suburbs to avoid the infinity niggers.
>1pbtid
beep boop
Walkable cities is a scam. You'll only be allowed anywhere within walking distance.
>don't forget you also have to walk back
And here is another similar thread
>why don't you live in comfy apartment complese and have sex
I WILL NOT WALK AROUND NIGGERS
There've never been walkable cities, only towns and villages.
Trucking companies more than car companies.
Also mafia-dominated paving and concrete companies in modern times.
I'd happily go back to horses. I grew up in a third world country where horse drawn carts were still as common a mode of transport as trucks or busses. Comfy as fuck.
This is so stupid. If you want a walkable city, move to Manhattan, Boston, Miami, even Columbus fuckin' Ohio.
Stop trying to hustle me into the city.
North American cities are simply not designed for it. You'd have to rebuild most of the cities for this. Plus, yuropoors and chinkoids are already used to living in the pod, we arent
men care about territories. in high-density areas, your territories are often violated. it's not normal for men to like living in a city.
Rope for WEFaggots, herbs for this thread
>posts picture of white city
lol
LMFAO even
America is a giant shopping mall, where consoomer is the number priority. Cars allows you consoomer in greater quantity. So you need massive parking lots and giant multi lane roads. Those who don't consoomer aren't catered too, so no sidewalks on major roads.
Because they want to commit crime on foot and are afraid of license plate readers
The reason Americans don't like walkable cities? They have no spacial awareness.
>somehow having cities where people can walk influences amerilards living in the countryside
interesting level of schizophrenia you have there pal
Left one looks like shit.
Because the US is 10x the size of Europe.
Getting flash mobbed isn't fun.
Amerilard education
>walkable city
>filled with electric scooters, electric bikes, mopeds, segways and other motorized or half motorized vehicles
such walkable, much safe
When the Hunter Biden story broke, the media and former Obama intelligence and law enforcement officials went into overdrive. On October 19, 2020, over 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter alleging the laptop report was disinformation without evidence for the statement. Then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden would later use it in a presidential debate with President Donald Trump to state the narrative about his son was false.
Zuckerberg told Rogan no one could prove the story wasn’t true. So, Facebook allowed it to be shared but admitted the censorship of the news was meaningful. When the podcast host asked if he regretted suppressing it, the CEO said, “Yeah, yeah. I mean, it sucks.” He added fact-checkers couldn’t prove it was disinformation and, reflectively, holding it back sucked.
Did Censorship Affect the Election?
In early August, a New Jersey-based Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics poll found that 79% of Americans thought Trump would be president today if voters knew about the laptop report. The Media Research Group noted that 45% of those who voted for Biden had no clue about the allegations against Hunter Biden and his father, and 16% said they would not have voted for him. That’s enough to swing the outcome to Trump.
So, did censorship impact people’s votes in 2020?
It appears former Attorney General William Barr thinks it did.
The walkable parts of cities in asia are because they doint have money to modernise them for cars. in europe, most of this is because of cultural preservation. these are market squares that go back several centuries. in the US, many cities were built for the purpose of industry... meaning they were established post-industrial revolution. im sure that there are many american villages and towns that are "walkable" if they were built in the 18th or 17th centuries. i have heard that Boston is an old american city that is very "walkable" and there is even a kind of market square there.
Simple as what?
Finish your sentence you stupid nigger
Old cities are walkable
New cities are fake and gay
If you're American, move to an old city like Boston
Don't forget to bully the new yorkers away and spit at non-whites
Yes Boston is such a based city that not even globohomo and liberalism can ruin it
Mostly white, everyone is racist, they hate anyone that isn't from New England and they preserved their traditional architecture instead of knocking it down to build.commieblocks
Most of the traditional architecture is expensive private homes, and the rich owners don't want their property value to decrease, so they resist policies to make more homes or make homes affordable
They also whinge enough about taxes that they can keep them around average forever
Have you not seen the nigger infestation plaguing society lately?