Engineers Are Turning Old Wind Turbine Blades Into Gummy Bears

YOU VILL EAT ZEE WINDMILLS

Attached: Nothing Personal Goy.jpg (1480x1977, 1.63M)

Other urls found in this thread:

euronews.com/green/2022/08/30/engineers-are-turning-old-wind-turbine-blades-into-gummy-bears-and-nappies
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Halal gummy bears for the muslims kek

How in the fuck?
Wtf are they made out of?

Link

euronews.com/green/2022/08/30/engineers-are-turning-old-wind-turbine-blades-into-gummy-bears-and-nappies

in reality? fiberglass

in the theoretical alternate reality op is shilling? some form of starch. starches are notable for not liking water.

Attached: Glass_reinforcements.jpg (1523x1437, 1.08M)

Dumb and gay its iust a chemically recyclable resin that coats the parts

No they are not you shill slide faggot.

Why not nuclear fusion? It seems to be the only possible step forward in terms of energy production at the global scale, if you’re that scared of another Chernobyl then just have them really far away from humanity.

why not make more windmills?

So we just turn the outer layer into gummy bears and throw the rest into landfill.
Right got it, thanks Klaus.

True composites are pretty much impossible to separate in a cost-effective way.

>True composites are pretty much impossible to separate in a cost-effective way.
How 'sustainable' of them.

>How in the fuck?
probably some ebin startup with a retarded idea and clueless lying jewish internet media tabloids making clickbait articles about it, that the even more clueless americanoid christcuck schizo masses who take being against renewable energies as a point of personal honor for some reason will eat up

>Wtf are they made out of?
depends, metal, aluminum, glass fiber, carbon fiber (fibers in resin in all cases)

>being against renewable energies
>turbines and batteries
>renewable
Hehe

>have industrial waste
>feed it to people
>make them pay for it also
The true and tested communist China model

>have industrial waste
>feed it to people
>make them pay for it also
What is flouride?
HOOOONK!

>>turbines and batteries
>>renewable
>Hehe
well yeah, if you make the turbines out of metal it's extremely trivial to repair them, and batteries can hold several orders of magnitude more energy over the many charge-discharge cycles of their lifetime than the energy it would require to rebuild them from a dead batterie if their life is indeed limited

Stop with the antisemitism

...

This shit is killing millions of birds and also affect the cattle. Fuck you faggot

>Why not nuclear fusion? It seems to be the only possible step forward in terms of energy production at the global scale,
you probably don't know anything about the subject so I will give you the tl dr:

>the way our universe works, some things only happen or happen way easier under some conditions
(you can see it with stuff like chemical reactions only happening once they reach a specific temperature)
>the problem for fusion is pressure (or maybe it's average distance between atoms? not sure). Either way, fusion becomes easier and easier with more pressure
>stars spend literally billions of years doing fusion without any effort, and they can fuse anything except iron, yeet any light atom, hydrogen, oxygen, helium, silicon and carbon, can all be used by stars to serve as a working fusion reactor, because fusion is extremely easy for stars, due to the massive pressure

and that's where the real problem comes:
>on earth, there is no pressure, stars can just sit there doing nothing and achieve massive pressures, just because a lot of gas fell on top of them, humans don't get that luxury, meaning that without the pressure, we can't run fusion reactors on anything unlike stars, we can fuse carbon, star cores can, you could literally throw a pencil in the core of a star and it would produce gigantic ammounts of energy through fusions, not on earth, because no pressure
>this means the only things we think we can do fusion with right now are extremely rare isotopes of hydrogen and helium

And that's the issue, it defeats the whole purpose, fusion would be great because we could use anything to get the same ammount of energy as a regular nuclear fission reactor, you could literally use ocean water or crayons as fuel rather than rare uranium 235

except because we're not cheating with free pressure unlike stars, we can only do fusion with stuff that is EVEN MORE RARE than U235, like deuterium and tritium

If we ever could manage to create gigantic pressures and temperatures inside tiny little metal boxes on earth's surface, then great, it would mean we could use almost anything to generate power on the same scale as existing nuclear power plants, but if we can't ever figure it out, it means we can at best fuse shit like tritium, that is far more difficult to obtain than uranium, making fusion reactors just a worse and far more expensive version of existing nuclear reactors (talking about how expensive getting fuel for them would be)

and that's the whole issue, stars cheat with gigantic ammounts of pressure they get for free, we start at 1 bar of pressure, which might as well be complete vacuum as far as fusion is concerned

so ironically, something like a dyson sphere around a star is the best type of fusion reactors we could ever design, of course, you can't exactly pack a dyson sphere in your chest cavity like ironman or on the back of your spaceship, they're not exactly convinient or movable

>This shit is killing millions of birds and also affect the cattle. Fuck you faggot
oh no, not the 5% of birds that are too retarded to not fly in the 0.0001% of air where giant visible air turbines are, whatever will we do

>cattle
impressive, I didn't know cows could fly, even more impressive they found a way to fly yet are too stupid not to fly inside the giant shredders