>money and working bad
>why…
>BECAUSE I SAY SO
Money and working bad
Jackson Morales
Charles Lopez
That's not what he said. He said that money has value equating to time. He's still retarded, but it's an actual idea.
Jackson Collins
Labor has no inherent value. Some labor is actually destructive.
Anyone with a hobby knows this. As a coinfag I have gotten bargains on coins because amateurs clean them, which ruins the value
Matthew Nelson
He said "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
Jacob Long
Why do these commies always have these fucking crusty beards?
Jose Mitchell
In this case: socialist. In which case anarchists would be the crusty ones according to Hasan Piker.
Landon Hill
You have never visited a doctor, correct?
Parker Roberts
Dummy, that's not what was said. It's not that labor has no value. It's just not inherent as he had pointed out it can be destructive, even counterproductive.
Joshua Parker
Life long work dodging neckbeard. Leached off his father and then his factory owning friends father. He's like an ancient version of some youtuber who eats junk food for fat fetishists.
Alexander Collins
Why didn't you get the local busker to diagnose your sore foot?
Isn't all labor equal?
Matthew Butler
There is just as much value in destruction if not more than construction you single brain-celled amoeba.
Get off my fucking board you binary bitch.
Hunter Gray
Unironically interesting. Examples?
Andrew Taylor
No.
No one is arguing against the value of destruction. That's not what's meant in "destructive" like it's demolition.
Michael Wilson
To further put it, "destructive" would mean more like "ruinous."
Blake Peterson
I also agree that the competent should be paid more for their services.
Jaxon Flores
I know what you're driving at. But what I'm saying is this .
Ryan Moore
Who decides "needs?"
If the crackhead on the corner wants a Cadillac... should he get it?
Zachary Myers
Sounds reasonable to me.
Brandon Wood
Well, if you're talking from the anarchist school of thought it'd be an ever ongoing process what what is an inequality and what isn't. In which case what is understood as essentials for living is shelter and food really. But, going further, a more leftist ideal would be to not be so dependent on automobiles.
Andrew Bennett
>essentials for living is shelter and food
USA/Canada basically provides that for the poor already. Conclusion: Marxists not welcome!
Lincoln Miller
What he meant is "from each according to what I tell you to each according to what I tell you.