How many variants of the 'LGBT' initialism have you seen?
Every few weeks I spot another edit to the brand. Why do they have to make so many revisions?
How many variants of the 'LGBT' initialism have you seen?
James Mitchell
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Anthony Morris
that's the schizophrenia flag
Michael Morris
Nathaniel Johnson
wait they really added the monkey pox circle? lmao we made it
Levi Watson
Because the revolution never stops.
Joseph Phillips
Kad esh
Blake Parker
Ryan Garcia
>How many variants of the 'LGBT' initialism have you seen?
0 in my country, a ton on the internet in english speaking countries especially
london is even looking like a nazi rally except with faggotry rather than swastika
Gabriel Fisher
sus
Zachary Garcia
why isn't this spammed on university campuses?
Camden Martinez
>Why do they have to make so many revisions
to sell more flags
Gavin Gomez
lgbt is a pedophile movement
youtube.com
Adam Garcia
This is my favorite one since the bear signifies my identity
Dylan Smith
It's to see how much degeneracy they can pack into it before the gays and lesbians catch on that they're just being pushed out by all the mental illness. Or before the rest of the still sane people go full 1488 on all of them.
Henry Moore
>Or before the rest of the still sane people go full 1488 on all of them
can i get an eta in this?
Connor Williams
I mean what do you mean? There are many variants as many as you want to make.
This one is a classic and obviously a favorite
Xavier Green
This one is also a favorite, for me anyway
Samuel Rodriguez
Mason Clark
weeks(2)
Grayson Gonzalez
There's this thing which is not an acronym but it should be
Owen Long
>what do you mean
There is no continuity to the initialism. I saw one yesterday called LGBTiQ. Is there a central organization who officially moderates what initialism gets added? How are these things decided what is valid or not? Is there a catalog somewhere of all the crazy combinations.
I think it's completely ridiculous. The point of initializing something is for ease of sharing information. But nobody can agree upon what the conclusive word should be, and it's so long as to defeat the purpose of initializing it. It's ludicrously stupid. You would think it would collapse under it's own weight and people would shun it for being ludicrous.