when did you realise moon landing was a hoax in 60s?
50 years later with modern tech and we still can't get to the fucking moon
Other urls found in this thread:
kill yourself
you first you tulip eating cunt
wanker
No Aliens helping...
Around the time I saw hipsters wearing nasa shirts
> "science is out of this world"
CHINA WON
What did the government spend all that money on from the space program?
Nuclear subs that can ram other subs?
Maybe they only got to watch it once on their neighbours black and white tv or just listened to it on the radio..
The problem isn't the technology, the problem is that once the US beat the Soviets in space, the modern US manned space program was turned into a money laundering apparatus. Voters accept that "space is hard" and "no bucks no Buck Rogers", so they don't question such exorbitant sums being spent for so little results. At least, that was the case until nasty SpaceX came along and did lots of things on a (relatively) shoestring budget.
* The Space Transportation System aka Space Shuttle was an expensive clusterfuck
* The Constellation program (STS rebranded) was an expensive clusterfuck
* The SLS/Orion projects (STS rebranded again) is an expensive clusterfuck
Dude, it was always a money laundering apparatus.
The climate change scam. That's what they've been using nasa for mostly.
Devil's advocate, but could it be that the shills have commandeered the whole
>moon landing is a hoax
As a way to not talk about
>the failures of diversity in the workplace
?
Bingo.
And you don't find the fact that the only reason we ever ended up "going to space" was to beat the Soviets at a propaganda war to be at the very least a little bit suspicious?
That's because you (anglos) decided to genocide the only people who were ingenious enough to come up with the tech in the first place
>60s
>exploit top iq European engineers
60 years later, they’re all dead and the only way USA could possible get that talent again is by waging another war in Europe
I hope you mutts drown in your own diversity filth
>space shuttle
>modern tech
L M A O
The goal of the Artemis mission is to put a black person and a woman on the moon. It doesn’t take genius to realize how poorly a mission with the profile is going to be organized.
Let. Diversity us NASA's strength you see?
I'm sure as a whole NASA is not considering this, but I'm wondering if a few people at the top aren't wondering if they should just start hiring the best people for job, even if that person is a straight White male. It would be bad PR but they might actually get to go to the Moon again if they do.
fpbp
>NOOO THIS IS SO SAD AND DISAPPOINTING BROS. I WANTED TO SEE NIGGERS ON THE MOON SO BADLY, ANOTHER HARD L FOR THE WEST !!!
Given advances made in the 50's and 60's and the culture centered around excellence and general relation to reality I believe it's more possible people walked on the moon in the 60s than today. The west has lost it's grip and it's continually pushing down this self destructive path. SLS will never put people on the moon.
Even if it was real... what benefit did the landing on the moon bring to humanity?
What talent? This continent is now inhabited by eggheads whose greatest field of expertise is being cucks.
The second I compared images and videos. Like the austronaut on his knees and then getting up to a standing position without moving his arms or legs.
>While sheeple are arguing about shadow angles and flags moving
Can't wait to see them send humans through the radiation belt without proper led sheilding
The space race in the early days was simply building ICBM's and potentially weaponizing another theater of operation. The earliest maned launches were literally on ICBM's. Exploration is an easy way to stomach dumping money on weapons programs and research. The space race died out when the US established supremacy in this realm. Now it's spinning back up due to public support and potential adversarial nations challenging this supremacy and companies like boeing are taking advantage of this by throwing some old hardware together to satisfy this and getting billions more from the feds. But they are incapable at engineering anything of significance anymore, they're riding old designs out and generally duct-taping shuttle parts in a cope rocket. SpaceX has momentum and seems to have the engineers to back it up. I'll give them the odds to accomplishing significant advances over boeing or other mil contractors.
>when did you realise moon landing was a hoax in 60s?
After I watched Massimo Mazzucco's masterpiece "American Moon"
m.youtube.com
No shit? The legacy aerospace companies were running on an archaic 1950s-60s business model and SpaceX found a better, cheaper way to do it. They were sustained by the Air Force who were also getting tired of Boeing's shit.