Moon landing is fake

Video of Apollo 17 taking off from the moon. Does this look real to you? How can anyone still believe the moon landing hoax after seeing this?

youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs

Attached: Ioh74fd.gif (320x240, 3.62M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ntbInwqsqAM
youtube.com/watch?v=dIkHLO93lCA
youtube.com/watch?v=4-zzqW1WKZE
youtube.com/watch?v=Sf3uF0juIVI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Ghilaine mentions imaginary friend a17

>does this look real to you
yeah

I hate sciencecucks

no. who took the video?
waste

Attached: another funny.jpg (1280x1280, 410.24K)

>who took the photo
the camera on the tripod they set up before leaving

fucking checked and saged

Attached: Apollo_11_lunar_module.jpg (1024x988, 138.13K)

What a waste, HR will be in touch with you soon.

Attached: 1661277178963965.jpg (578x712, 41.96K)

youtube.com/watch?v=ntbInwqsqAM

new webm

Attached: 1650714257427.webm (1280x720, 2.79M)

faces of the Apollo 11 astronauts at their 'post moon trip' press conference

moon landing tape with 'original audio'
lots of 4 letter words
'can you believe it we are on the fucking moon'

Attached: 1st moon crew.jpg (640x480, 41.09K)

Checked. The better question is if it was faked why didn’t the Soviets or the Chinks call us out?

Attached: 1658207876312.webm (1280x720, 2.79M)

The Moon is fake. Why do we only see one side? Because it's a painting.
OP is fake. Has anyone ever seen him in real life?

How do you know what a real lander taking off from the moon should look like?

forgot the video link
moon landing with lots of foul four-letter language

youtube.com/watch?v=dIkHLO93lCA

Attached: werner von mason.jpg (750x732, 86.64K)

>Does this look real to you?
No. Apollo Moon landings were fake.

I don't care

Attached: 5595f19360349f91.jpg (960x720, 136.62K)

you better care i will skullfuck you until you love faking moon orgasms and ask to marry my pecker and you won't do shit you careless fucking nigger faggot.

Seriously, the Russian were doing crazy shit to try to be the first on the moon. They absolutely would have shown it was a fake if that were true.
The Chinese were still essentially in the 19th century in 1969.

>Says "I hate science cucks"
>Using a smartphone
>That wouldn't be here without science
Yup flag checks out for retardation.

Someone needs to ask the kid in picrel.

Attached: 1660880839570436.gif (477x536, 3.77M)

well this confirms it, KEK himself manifested and bodied this slide thread out of orbit

Attached: 1596068423190.jpg (680x979, 146.56K)

>read this
>watch some Russian space footage
lol

Attached: 1630577077016.webm (1280x720, 2.86M)

Humans haven't been beyond the Van Allen radiation belt because the shielding would be too heavy for our limpdick rockets.

We could do it with nuclear pulse propulsion but people are too retarded and too gay to do cool shit anymore.

They're all in on that lie, just like the Antarctic Treaty which prevents us from going to see the ice wall.

Yes that looks real given the atmospheric and gravity situation on the moon

I think the standard explanation is the earth in the sky acts a moon and is reflective or that the surface itself is highly reflective

Neck yourself Canuck,
You're mad we did before you.

>They absolutely would have shown it was a fake if that were true.
why wouod the soviets turn on their (((masters)))

Attached: 1656600650762.jpg (751x423, 164.15K)

This site is fake. You're all AI bots.

space is fake, nasa lies, we live under the firmament.

nasa fails compilation - (buried video on youtube)
youtube.com/watch?v=4-zzqW1WKZE

also, get saved anons. it's easy to get to heaven.

youtube.com/watch?v=Sf3uF0juIVI

Attached: romans 10.13.jpg (640x335, 76.87K)

I kind of frankly don't care either way. It's not like 9/11 where they started a war over it.

I don't know how it's supposed to look since I have no reference of what's real when it comes to a module taking off in low gravity with no atmosphere.