Without being racist

>Basically white people and such got lucky. Eurasia was simply a better place to build society as opposed to subsaharan Africa
If Niggers developed in Europe and Aryans developed in Africa, Africa would be the centre of the world today, and you know it. Guns, germs and steel is a cope.
Nobody fights better than whites.
Whites evolved at the North Pole anyway kek

Attached: CE637AE2-BD2B-4614-9096-A22909E29EF9.jpg (1908x1107, 525.16K)

Everyone else either lived on large continents with abundant resources and so didn't have to compete as much, or were chimp tier savages battling over scraps. Europeans could work together well enough to form small societies, but were too poor and antisocial to form one spanning the whole continent, so we were forced to innovate and expand to avoid getting conquered by our neighbors.

This is crazy.
People with white skin grew up in cold climates with less sunlight, more clouds, colder temperatures, less food, even less animals. Less insects, less foliage. If they're white, then they developed themselves in these climates.

They were willing to work harder. And they had more resources. And they got lucky being on islands like England where they wouldn't get invaded too much. Anyway sorry hope I wasn't racy.

The Mediterranean basin has much higher soil iodine than other regions. Other peoples were essentially mentally retarded compared to whites.

skin color doesn't matter except to racists

Very simply humans are a divinely created species. White people have the least non human admixture, because we were humans who went into europe instead of other parts of the world where those hominins existed. For some special reason whites are not mixed very much with neanders.

It isn't white people that are superior it is Homo sapiens that is superior over the other hominins at the time.

Attached: anthropology migration middle east africa and mixture with hominins chart of mixture.jpg (1280x1263, 154.67K)

>without being racist
that's literally the answer though

The real reasons are that Europe was just a pretty good geographical region for the most part. But when they couldn’t do more and had limited resources, they were forced to explore and eventually conquer other people and races. Not that they wanted, they had to. The sciences and art were developed as a result of living in a highly resourceful society. If you’re living good, you might as well advance in other areas. Asians could’ve, but were let down by invaders of other hunter gatherer groups.

The implication is prejudicial and malignant, moron. But you already knew that, didn't 'cha?

>robbing, stealing, raping and destroying other races, culture and their lands.

Attached: image_2022-08-28_210007881.png (880x592, 1.06M)

I am glad the same is now happening you fucking "white" dogs, May God strike down your nations to collapse more sooner. Fucking die, every single one of you rats.

Attached: Decline of the Roman Empire.jpg (1200x800, 140.84K)

Asians and Africans, and even injuns in the americas did that as well, what’s your point?

Whites were bred be more intelligent

Attached: mathematicians map.png (912x597, 162.96K)

Maritime expertise

you are insane... and how many millions of brown people have white people to thank for their very lives... Their populations would never reach what they are now, they would never have as much of what is needed for survival as now. Ungrateful to only look at the negative side of things imo.

I'm guessing you are mostly white too but larp as some minority so you can feel superior, kek. I think I know which one!

We certainly were cruel to you. The English Empire was very cruel. But it also created the computer. But I don't know; I think China would have created the computer eventually. And they are much more peaceful recently.

Just wait til China starts trying the same thing.

Very simply, you are a moron who hasn't the faintest clue how or why the Homo Sapiens species was created!

Whites were already richer and more intelligent than the rest of world back when the rest of the world was invading, raping, stealing from, and looting Europe.

Attached: Wealth_Year_1500.jpg (1750x1238, 245.98K)

Africa has some of the most fertile land.

not an argument, enlighten me

The alps and rijy coast.

The Roman's invented the computer

The computer relied on the binary system, which Gottfried based on yin-yang. So technically chinks could’ve made the computer first, but whites did lol

holy cope
Europe was a barbarian backwater for most of it's history even under the Romans

MATH

Math allowed everything
>muh arabs
Meme

Computations are a banking concept, simpleton, and they weren't created in England but manufactured for England by Venice.

Jared Diamond says continental orientation (North-South versus East-West) influences the spreadability of technology (like farming techniques) so Europeans had an inherent advantage.

But really its just that God prefers whites. White are (or were) extremely Christian. There are benefits to being right about religion, and becoming the massively dominant culture is the consequence.

massive amounts of death and disease.

nice counter-cope

Attached: 3lYysWShWIIq0AXI_mQS1UF5tWo8zlKrt5TJsisswUQ.jpg (1237x1017, 162.45K)

Most tribes chose migration, conquest and scalping.
White Europeans chose settlement, collaboration and God.

>Europe was a barbarian backwater for most of it's history even under the Romans
That's a big fat lie propagated by early Christianity, who destroyed the Pagan cultures. We've always been incredibly advanced

Christianity

He deserves to get executed right there

According to whom?
>Jewish historians
Ah.

It's funny, that you actually believe that.

I don't think the nomads were the problem in China, if anything it was the opposite, their society was far too unified. Throughout history, it's either been one massive country with all the resources they could possibly need, or a bunch of squabbling warlords with no real authority constantly jockeying for the throne, and neither of those is really good for innovation or expansion. Plus there's the collectivism aspect as well, if all your profits and hard work go to the Emperor there's little incentive to do more than the minimum.

ability to precieve the future and the logical consequences of their actions. However, this is also their greatest weakness when you allow vile sorcerers to confuse them with apocalyptic tales of doom and gloom.

They went to India and pretty much hijacked all the teachings the Hindu gurus had worked on

Even Newton and Copernicus, their findings were all based on work done at Hindu temples. The Jesuit priests would visit India, write down scrolls of stuff then tell the world they discovered stuff

It was sad

yeah that is what humans tend to do mate, Central Asian's, Muslims, and even Greek offshoots were invading and massacring Indians every half century long before the Europeans rolled up in early modernity looking for spices and Chinamen

You dipshit, your environment is one of the primary factors for evolution. If 1/4th of the year meant you could easily die due the environment preventing you to farm and it's just too cold for you to live in a cheap shelter of sticks, that forces you to have foresight and prepare accordingly. Conversely if you live in an environment where you don't have to do much to survive, you're not going to pumping that brain power to do much more. Now amplify this across millennia and you see how 2 different groups can progress differently.

I see a lot of posts of people parroting the word "luck". Asians, Arabs, and Europeans where the only ones to refine metal and advance out of the stone age. Indigenous Americans and Africans never did. All three, Asians, Arabs, and Europeans all beat each other to different points in fields of construction, warfare, medical, etc. Neither of the other 2 got close to anything. Egyptians, Mesopotamians, and Summerians where all more advanced than anything in Africa from there time up until this point.
And no, none of those 3 wuz kangs. They where genetically Arabs.

of course this is true but there are many such historical "accidents" that massively favored whoever was aligned with God.
Until about 40 years ago all of the "west" was called Christendom

Romans patterned their literal land claims upon division and conquest, fucking idiot.

that is true as well

Winters.

The keyword here is the climate. Whites evolved ina very unhospitable environment that created a pressure in selecting the smartest and the most disciplined.

I do belive that Neanderthal even tough went extinct had a lot of qualities, that explains why Europeans and Asians are the only one capable of building civilisation.
Another aspect, very important is Christianity.

Indigenous Americans and Africans did refine metal though, the latter with help from Arabs and former not as extensively as other groups, but still.

Terrorism.

Wrong, moron

based and redpilled environment

Attached: 1656952765542.gif (600x400, 763.45K)

> He assumed the position

>Without being racist
God, chinks are so neutered now. First china cucked out to pelosi and Taiwan and now this.

>Without being racist
How do you explain evolved biological differences without being racist?

Attached: Louis Gauffier (Poitiers, Poitou, Kingdom of France 1762-1801 Livorno, Kingdom of Etruria, French Republic) Portrait of diplomat Dr. Thomas Penrose (1769-1851), with Florence in the background - Oil on Canvas 1798-min.jpg (3310x4411, 3.87M)

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE!

ENGLAND & JAPAN are BOTH islands, that had long, severe unification wars- and on an island there is no where else to go.
They both developed highly militaristic feudal systems to keep order - with over polite, over structured societies to keep the peace.
Both societies had to over-regulate and over systematize their culture so everything was clearly defined in their "rulebooks" - and the members of those societies were raised to live by those "rulebooks" policies to the letter.
The other societies colonized by England & Japan could not compete with their level of organization and efficiency. They both took out other societies in a systematic way no other could.

What have you been reading? Lol

>nothing to do with race
>environment caused two different races to evolve to be more intelligent

lmao

Based

He's referring to the Antikythera mechanism, an analogue computer, which was Greek in origin.

Attached: 9787-770x433.jpg (770x433, 68.97K)

>what is the actual reason whites
you mean europeans?

This, Europeans dominated the world because they believed in the correct God, things went downhill after the Great Schism of 1054, and Satan was loosed.

England & Japan were not more intelligent, just better organized. The people close to them that they conquered were of similar race but not motivated to be as efficient. Race & evolution had nothing to do with it.

Yuck it up, dickwad, it has nothing to do with race per se but bloodline. Certain bloodlines, usually the most exogamous, contained higher levels of awareness (wisdom).

We started allowing research and exploration, then free speech had a wiggle room and voilla! We were catapulted ahead just like with the 50m years the greek had such feat 8freedom to question authority)

We had 500 years of it, what ledt to the industrial revolution.

Europe was getting dominated by foreigners for centuries after they became abandoned paganism and became Christians (jew worshipers). Huns, Turkics, Arabs, etc were invading successfully for centuries.
>not more intelligent

that's not what IQ tests say.
>not race but bloodline
race is just an extended bloodline

Attached: 1024px-World-iq-map-lynn-2002.svg.png (1024x525, 166.3K)