Artemis is the name for the NASA program to return to the moon this decade. Artemis is the twin sister of Apollo, and in many ways this program will continue the legacy of the Apollo missions. Artemis began in 2017, and the SLS rocket began development in 2011
Current Timeline >Artemis I (August 29 2022) An unmanned Orion spacecraft will conduct a flyby of the moon, and return to earth in a 42 day mission.The SLS Rocket will launch from the historic LC-39B launch pad at 8:33 am EST from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida
>Artemis II (2024) A Crewed Orion craft will flyby around the moon, and initial construction of the Lunar Gateway Space Station will commence. The Lunar Gateway is a space station that will orbit the moon and act as a hub for future lunar landings
>Artemis III (2025+) The first moon landing since the 1970s. A crew will land at the lunar south pole. An Orion Spacecraft will dock with a SpaceX Starship lunar lander, and land on the moon.
>Artemis IV (2027) Artemis missions are planned for well into the 2030s. Construction of a permanent lunar base is planned for the 2030s.
I do concede they may have landed stuff on the moon, although it's not clear to me that the americans in the 60's did so successfully. They made their fake moon landings with grey/ashen coloured surface, when it was becoming known that the surface of the moon is brown. They had to decide and they chose wrongly. Ever since, they have had to pretend and deny the clear fact that the moon's surface is brown when seen up close, and also according to spectral analysis. When the chinks sent a rover there, the brown colour was obvious. And no, they didn't just land oat a ashen coloured area. They weren't sure about the colour of the surface and made the wrong choice. It's perhaps the biggest tell that moon landing photos are all fake.
Gavin Perez
Looks kind of brown in some of the colour photos. A lot of washout though. Also regolith may or may not be completely uniform. Didn't the chink one land on the dark side?
no you can land electronics and rovers type shit on the dark side, they'd seize up due to cold temp and become unusable straight away, and there's no way to communicate with them. they'd seize up similarly in the shadow of a large rock on the bright side.
Dominic Ward
Well I mean you could launch a few satellites in high orbit to communicate. The command module didn't shut down on the dark side. Figured electronics can deal with cold pretty well. I mean we sent shit WAY into deep space and its still running. Probably need an RTG though, I suppose.
Ayden Powell
space is very fake and very gay rockets are fake earth is hollow the sun isn't real science isn't real the jews made it up
Xavier Cook
those photos are colour correct, you can tell by the usa flag. They just got the colour of the surface all wrong. Here's a Russian paper about it:
But the dirt looks brown on his suit? In a high degree of sunlight colours can get washed out.
Brandon King
I'm so excited guy. May this launch be a success. I want real space exploration to return so bad.
Jeremiah Gutierrez
static satellite with just electronics perhaps, but rovers with moving parts will seize up.
Jacob Moore
have a look at that article I linked. It's takes a highly scientific approach. Google translate does a good job.
Oliver Jackson
reality is very fake and very gay rockets are fake earth is gay the sun goes up the tide goes out no one can explain that shit the jews made it up
Asher Rogers
Hm yeah you'd probably need an RTG, would give enough local infrared to keep moving parts from seizing up. Could use Pelletier's and heat pipes as well.
Daniel James
I wish Jews were fake and gay.
Jose Robinson
>The first moon landing since the 1970s.
they’re really going to the moon this time lads!!….lol
