Why do right wingers deny that the Confederates fought for slavery?
Why do right wingers deny that the Confederates fought for slavery?
Confederates fought to have a CONFEDERATION, dumbass. It's in the fucking name. How can you not understand this?
>Why do right wingers deny that the Confederates fought for slavery?
If they didn't fight, they'd still have slavery.
The Jews paid for the war to destroy what America was and to start globohomo.
Eliminate all niggers.
Why did they wait until their pro-slavery candidate lost to do this?
I WANT TO BREEEED!
confederates fought for black ass
Because living under fiat currency central banking is unironically worse. The north fought for a more brutal and faggy kind of slavery.
They didn't. They fought for states rights. Even the Union didn't fight for slavery, that only happened at the end. No one wanted to fight for the slaves, that was only a small part of it.
T. History fag
Why are str8 men so mentally ill they spam bleeding front holes they worship in a board about politics?
Cause we have witness/veteran testimony that proves this is not the case? Look dude the CSA was as divided as the Union and as such had several factions fighting together in the War and SHOCKER, not all of them cared or even liked slavery.
They Fought for Freedom from a Federal Government(Hence CONFEDERACY), Against Northern Centric Tariffs(IE Taxes on Imports), National Honor and Pride(North Invading, Robert E. Lee as Example), and Slavery. War is almost never a single issue event.
Imagine choosing a blackie over a mena baddie
>When your black qt waifu has already assumed the sniff position as you arrive home from a hard day of posting on Any Forums
blessed
I'd get a sack of cotton drop it all over the floor and play an old negro spiritual from the early days of recording music with crackling sounds and everything, I'd be totally legit.
deny? i too would fight to retain ownership of that hot slice of dark submissive ass
>They fought for states rights.
No they didn't, slavery was enshrined into the confederate constitution which makes it impossible for states to choose if they want to be a slave state or not
They technically fought for state rights.
The north wanted big government
The south wanted to keep their cheap labor... But I doubt they treated black people bad, many were servants in their own homes.
Both sides failed, and separate ethno territories should have been established
Jews are not the confederacy and the only reason why it was tolerated was because of Christianity even though Jews were over 90% of slave owners despite being the world's smallest minority.
Cause if Southern Interests can be represented at the Federal Level effectively why Revolt?
Bullet Box only becomes considered when the Ballot Box fails.
There were vast racial, cultural and political differences, far beyond slavery.
The North was largely urban, industrial, statist, not terribly religious and had a lot of white ethnic minorities, Germans from Pennsylvania and Ohio, Irish and Italians from New York, etc.
The South was largely rural, agrarian, very independent, deeply religious with far fewer white ethnic minorities, other than a smattering of Scots and French in Louisiana, most everyone was a WASP.
Yes they did thought, a Confederation is inherently more State centric then a Federation.
There are several legal rights gained by Southern States in the CSA, including control over their own TRADE Regulations in Ports.
>Any Forums would choose a black woman over a sand qt.