Big brother and their shills say that "conspiracy theorists" are all just a bunch of deranged mentally ill schizos and should be ignored. So if that's the case, then why go to great lengths to attempt to "debunk" this "conspiracy theory" of this nurse being dead? The real kicker in all of this is that this should have been the simplest thing to prove and yet they failed to accomplish that. Instead, if you listen to this audio-only podcast with no evidence given it will actually leave you MORE convinced that Tiffany Dover is dead. There are many people who thought Tiffany was alive but then they listened to this and it actually convinced them she really is dead. So what was the point of them having made this podcast? If the point was to "debunk" a "conspiracy theory" then it has failed miserably, and it would have been better off if they had just ignored the matter entirely. This only added more fuel to the suspicions that something criminal had happened to her.
Why did NBC make this podcast?
Other urls found in this thread:
stitcher.com
twitter.com
were all the competent people at the network purged? calling it stupidity probably is not right, so perhaps it is calculated but it is unclear what the objective would be.
Because they are full of shit.
Never listened to it but normies who did seemed discombobulated after probably the after effect of being brainwashed.
Cognitive dissonance and big pharma money in Acton lads.
Probably about time we revisited this memoryhole
>stitcher.com
>If the point was to "debunk" a "conspiracy theory" then it has failed miserably
Fear makes you sloppy
"Theyre afraid" isnt a meme, it's an observation we've been able to make since they started using rape, racism, and bigotry to pit us against the truth
They ARE afraid
that's what leads them to such desperation as "publish an hour long audio show about this topic despite not having evidence"
if you back an animal into a corner it will lash out
It might get stomped out or 10 gauged when it does, but it will lash out because theyre fucked either way
They used to ignore conspiracies
They even used to let crazy looking actors on TV tell us the truth because they knew we would laugh
And now they realize that their ship is sinking and they feel the desperate need to plug holes even as they realize it's no use
I think the internet played the biggest role
Conspiracy theories took so long to spread that (((they))) had time to create the version they reveal to the mass public
And if course so many mainstream outlets we're all talking about history and older sources
No one was able to point out these small holes in the story appearing every day, too a mass audience, like they can now
If they slip up, we don't rely on hearing their sanitized version of events on the news
We can see 3 different camera angles, hear statements that shouldn't be heard, and we can see the inconsistencies in real time before they even know how they're going to cover it up
If someone takes the chance and listens to one of those "nazi conspiracy schizos" the media warns them about, they will quickly find evidence thay makes them uneasy
Since many of these large conspiracies are connected, finding one truth means getting exposed to evidence of others, and that's when they lose their power
Shes definitely dead. She was also one of the first to take it so her death probably saved a few people who saw it
Why don't they just pay her a million dollars to go on GMA or something? Why would she turn down that kind of money?
The problem then is correctly identifying who "they" are, i.e. specific people or groups who are responsible. These are the details that people must agree upon before they can form a political movement.
Remember when they showed a picture of that different woman with a completely different hairline?
I remember ;)
Focal length, sweaty ;)
Money op money. No one would listen if it was just hey she's alive here's the proof gn.
No, a completely different line going over the top of her head, symetrical vs non-symetrical, sweety.
Bump
I mean it really is obvious the people and organizations responsible. The eat the bugs man and affiliated people, the CIA, heads of media orgs, European aristocracy etc etc.
I might download the whole audiobook cut down all the fat and totally destroy every point they have on this
Podcast*
I’m listening to it this preppy libtard has the most annoying voice
Wish me luck
For the same reason they put the Sandy Hook "victims" in the Super Bowl XLVII halftime show. It's a demonstration of power.
The message is simple: "Truth is irrelevant. We can lie to your face and most of your friends and family will agree with us over you."
This problem is worsened when you realize that these people aren't going to come out as world leader's and media CEOs
If there's a true conspiracy, all the "major players" we see would be pawns
Klaus Schwab, as an example, is here to get defamed, discredited, and even take a bullet for those that put him in his position
If a coopertive world leader goes down or becomes unpopular they can replace him
If it becomes obvious that world leaders or organizations are working together to consolidate control they can put them on trial while giving us a fresh batch of dictators
All that being said, discrediting, exposing, **etc.** the media heads is a decent place to start
but of course that helps them play into painting us as the evil schizos society is looking to use as a scapegoat
with the Jewish presence in media, our motives would be twisted before they reached the general public amd it would make ramp things up DRASTICALLY moving forward, so having contingencies for the shit show we create would be a top priority... even a successful defamation campaign could force resistors into hiding, not to mention what harsher actions against these figures would bring to anyone who publicly opposes (((them)))
Ill talk about organizing a little in my next post so it doesnt get burried in text
it’s okay you can just say jews you faggot. you don’t have to fall for dr. evil bugs man psyop. he is a nobody.
Here's the video of her "fainting".