Is the reason why royalty seems to be disproportionately homosexual is because royal hereditary customs forces faggots...

Is the reason why royalty seems to be disproportionately homosexual is because royal hereditary customs forces faggots to have sex with women and reproduce when they would have normally excluded themselves from the gene pool by exclusively engaging in homosexual sex had they not been born royalty?
Logically it makes sense, when you force a faggot to have sex with a woman the resulting offspring will be effeminate and mentally ill and royalty is stereotypically effeminate and mentally ill.
Faggots engaging in heterosexual sex is more dysgenic than incest.

Attached: Friedrich II.jpg (621x775, 133.09K)

i agree with your post but what is there to discuss about this

a few years ago there was some scholarship discussing the idea of the gay gene as a cock-hungriness gene.
it gets passed on because if your sister has it you will have many nephews and nieces despite being a faggot yourself.
of course it could be multiple genes, each making you slightly more cock-hungry and a combination of many making you exceedingly cock-hungry, like George Takei molesting an embarrassed man on Howard Stern cock-hungry. other multiple-gene conditions exist including height, eye color, and susceptibility to some diseases.
the topic did not attract funding, possibly because the idea of gayness as genetic implies the near-future possibility of a cure for teh big ghey, which is politically contentious ground.
I bring it up because it's the essential groundwork of your theory, OP. these men had the cock-hungry gene, they had it bad, but they were forced to put the p in the v by sacred duty anyway.

Sure. It doesn't help that royalty has no loyalty to the Europeans that they lord over.

the influence of genetics and other biological factors in homosexuality has been well known for known for centuries
medical books still discussed it in great detail a few years ago, dunno if they still do

And, yet, Friedrich der Große was one of the best, most capable rulers in European history. What's your argument, mutt?

Attached: Friedrich der Große.jpg (800x1017, 129.94K)

It's because they are all descended from literal pirates.

i started to find some rare gems of the female sex of my age attractive a few months after taking the parasite pill. still working out the kinks on that, in all likelihood it’s a constitutional trait for some of us, but the idea that a homosexual orientation could turn bisexual in some men is a sign, no? before someone asks, no i wasn’t raped and no i didn’t suddenly have these urges after a sexual experience, i had a certain affection for older lads before i had hair on my balls so it does not seem to be solely the result of parasites. unlike many anons, the only issue i have with homosexuality is that i want a family and another man can’t give that to you. otherwise i think it is part of the spice of life when kept in check and the so called ‘gay community’ maintains stricter rules on what behaviors are expected or proscribed, as was the case in the past.

You’re conflating real royalty which was usurped in the 16th and 17th centuries with retarded inbred cretins LARPing as royalty today.

>What's your argument
he literally had one job, a duty to his nation.
well, two jobs. he was good at the war stuff.

Attached: it's nothing.png (1024x768, 688.26K)