How do chuds argue against this?

Attached: 1661531567514497.png (738x361, 36.48K)

You know what else is costly for the government? Giving 6 billion shekels to israel.

The only people who argue against it are coping MIGA niggers who are pissed they didn't get a slice of the pie. You can get mad, you can get angry, but you cannot say I'm incorrect.

so the government is not going to recoup the losses? lol monumentally naive. yeah the taxpayers may not PAY off the debt directly, but the government will simply recoup its losses through another means: the taxpayer

Whose money is the government lending?

boring thread.
Sage.

feel free to have your 4 year old child make a loan to me, say $10k, then immediately forgive it, and then you tell me it's OK because it won't impact you and would've been costlier to carry the debt.

Argue with what? Their lack of comprehension of debt and loans? It's such a wildly stupid statement that I'm not even sure where to begin.

But no, it is not cheaper to forgive the debt than continue to hold it.

This is really their only argument. They act like their taxes increased over it. They sure were proud about muh $500billion platinum plan for nogs trump was going to push

the debts will be absolved, forgiven, expunged, however you want to describe it, but the government is still out some odd millions of dollars. they will recoup it from the nation aka taxpayers, which by the way ALSO includes said beneficiaries of the debt forgiveness because they are in fact citizens, taxpayers, and subject to tax law too