I hear this question a lot from foreigners and even from historians.
Unpopular opinion: There wasn't any reason to. Unless you were a jew/communist/freemason, your life was good.
I hear this question a lot from foreigners and even from historians.
Unpopular opinion: There wasn't any reason to. Unless you were a jew/communist/freemason, your life was good.
Other urls found in this thread:
big-lies.org
archive.is
twitter.com
You're right, there was no reason to until 1943 or so, when the war turned, bombings became more frequent/intense, the war economy became stricter, etc. But by that point people were already so deep that there was no real chance of revolt
Some did try to overthrow Hitler
They even made a movie about it
> Charting the real-life events that saw a number of high-ranking Nazi officers attempt to overthrow Hitler
because trannies are weaklings
Because he was right. Any atrocity can be justified by the proper facts.
Everyone revolted against (((Shitler))), even other hook nosed politicians.
But once the normies go full retard...
>TIL Scientologists tried to take over Nazi Germany.
And (((he))) almost never cited any facts, and also ignored most of them.
t. not a jew and still micromanaged by those sandniggers
Stauffenberg was in a quasi-masonic organization that worshipped the founders shotacon oneitis as a deity (George Kreis).
(((Stauffenberg)))? (((Hitler))) too.
big-lies.org
Archived:
archive.is
I had a strange, unfortunate chance to go through Munich/Bavaria government officials on Twitter and they all were busy honoring some student resistance movement that was throwing around leaflets.
Bavaria is where all Nazi HQs were stationed, and this Nurnberg city is also in Bavaria. But hey, at least some autists were throwing anonymous leaflets.
I don't recall the monkey brigade being given permission to speak.
Same reason why people listened to the vaccine mandates. They think the government knows best. Of course there are people who try to rebel, but the majority always listens to their leaders. I'm sure if the government ordered the deaths of those unvaccinated, not many would try to overthrow their government.
People seem to forget they made Germany pay for the entire WW1 and their economy was Kazakhstan tier before Hitler pumped the whole war industry to the max with bonds (ie fake money).
At its peak most of Nazi Germany's economy was from plundering occupied territories.
Better Germany went with Hitler rather than fall to the communist revolution in 1918-1919.
Because Germans are like Democrats, brain dead.
Hitler was the greatest man to ever live. Why would Germany turn on the man who saved them from the destruction of the kikes. Also blaming Hitler for the kikes manipulating 3 empires into fighting them is retarded.
Britain and France hated Germany and were backing other countries in causing trouble with Germany, they promised protection to Poland while Poland was trying to ethnically cleanse Germans. Churchill was completely owned by jews and repeatedly lied to and hit things from parliament to keep the war going (repeated peace offers).
Roosevelt was desperate to go to war with Germany and Japan, the US was following a policy of deliberate provocation with Japan in particular. He also was owned by jews.
Russia was run by Stalin but the government was mostly kikes. Hitler claimed he invaded as they were planning an invasion of Germany. Documents released after the fall of communism prove they were planning invasions.
Honestly I don't know. Look at the former East Bloc countries; sure, they are poorer than their western counterparts, but they are the only European countries that retained some of their culture and are also far better off demographically. The UK was allowing Indian and Caribbean migrants to enter the country as early as the 1950s/60s, Turks in Germany during the 60s, North Africans in France/Belgium by the 80s, and of course the US opened its borders in 1965. The socialist countries never did such things and, in the case of Germany in particular, actually preserved German culture and tradition more than west Germany did
Some small numbers did. Where were the mass revolts against scum like stalin or mao? There are many reasons a tyrant can hold onto unlimited power and most of them have nothing with life being good. Life sure af wasn't good in germany in 1944. Its a rather naive western notion that good beats evil or that a desire for freedom always triumphs.
(((Hitler))) was part of it too.
>inb4 more effeminate reactions
Because you enjoyed the expansion and the Blitzkrieg until it stopped working
Then it was too late
>Unpopular opinion: There wasn't any reason to. Unless you were a jew/communist/freemason, your life was good.
This might only be slightly unpopular on Facebook, but to have the balls to come here and say something like this... You madman. You absolute unit. Take my updoots, good sir. Today you have won the internet.