The ever changing narrative

Trump is going to jail hahahaha

You missed the State Legislatures using tbe fradulent election lie to pass Laws securing elections.
They also used the tactic of firing dem election officials and boards in order to replace them with Republicans .

There is very little chance of cheating this year Well by dems anyway.

If Laurence Tribe was correct everytime he claimed Trump was going to jail Trump would currently be serving over 7000 years
Laurence Tribe sells hopium to addicts.

will he be in jail in 2 more weeks?

and what documents did he illegally retain? FBI knew he had them, they could have taken them when they searched and said just put another lock on the door.

the changing narrative is entirely based on how the left wants to present the news story.

just two weeks to flatten the cu- put trump in jail!

Shit's all theater. You're stupid.

>sources close to the matter said.

Cool story

Attached: 53786A7D-09CF-4490-836D-1A28123767C6.gif (480x270, 3.31M)

former trump supporter here. ngl it's hilarious watching him crash and burn. seriously though we can't let him get his hands on the nuclear codes

No. It's the lawsuit they're filing.

>seriously though we can't let him get his hands on the nuclear codes
if you quit drinking the blue koolaid you'd know any nuclear codes that might've been in the documents would have been useless after he left office.

Attached: ebolaids.jpg (660x458, 227.02K)

like all the others filing suit covered by the media with jan 6th that were also thrown out.....

>appears

Attached: 1610942205572.jpg (2000x2000, 397.95K)

The gov't lost me when they blew up the ATT building in Nashville, the routing for dominion GA votes.bitchute.com/video/NYVdWBbl7UQ4/?fbclid=IwAR0yMk_4vHBLgdTqN1Sou-0T_BUKBXhq8meKnJQ9NZCpoR8xegT91zOFN1s

No, it's the lawsuit trumps team is filing.
You literally have no idea what's going on, but that's not gonna stop you from jumping head first to try to save daddy

The Obama administration in its final year in office spent a record $36.2 million on legal costs defending its refusal to turn over federal records under the Freedom of Information Act, according to an Associated Press analysis of new U.S. data that also showed poor performance in other categories measuring transparency in government.

For a second consecutive year, the Obama administration set a record for times federal employees told citizens, journalists and others that despite searching they couldn’t find a single page of files that were requested.

cbsnews.com/news/obama-administration-spent-36m-on-records-lawsuits-last-year/

Congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”

Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?

>Trump remains able to make the case that a special master should be appointed to review the seized documents, seek a more detailed receipt for what the FBI retrieved from Mar-a-Lago and restrain the justice department from further reviewing the materials until the process is complete.
>The reasoning, former US attorneys say, is that there could be communications seized by the FBI that are privileged, but not used in furtherance of a crime, and even if the justice department wanted to use them in its investigation, it should be precluded from doing so.
based 4d chess kek

So you have no idea what's going on at all.
They already took them. He was arguing that he never had them and they were planted.
You're gonna want to have a look at your news sources, it's more than obvious that you're not being told the full story