Was the French Revolution the beginning of the apocalypse?

It is directly linked to the foundations of America, the icon of sin and biggest ally of Israel.

Attached: images (31).jpg (554x438, 28.52K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XCzXL6zUjKY&list=PLdGv_ee4Fc4q6ytzjPo2ag7VC8l7Ojo-W&index=5
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

congratulations for finally levelling up

Attached: 1655097892812.jpg (392x331, 23.14K)

took you time to figure that out

No. The French Revolution had its faults but it got rid of the inbred royals and provided the inspiration for nationalism across Europe. It laid the ideological groundwork for Fascism and National Socialism

Average gdp of Brazil $20

AHAHAHHAHAHHHHHAHHAHAHH

Kek.

Another problem with the royals is they laid the foundations for the enlightenment/french revolution themselves by giving jews the sole power to charge usury and by turning a blind eye or actively joining free masonry. The British aristocracy was very guilty of both charges.

For what it is worth, there was a large segment of the French revolution that was carried out by Jesuits. From there Jesuits split up into different factions, some of them with noble causes or in opposition to other parts of Jesuit origins. Whenever Jesuits are brought up in pol, it is only described in nefarious terms or in the capacity of how they are currently perceived.

These are cons and what are the pros of the French Revolution?

Your country wouldn’t exist were it not for the ideals spread by the French revolution

You could make the argument that a perfect monarchy, one which is only granted to noble Christian families, is protection against the subversive jew and their usury. Absolute rule in Christian Europe, at the hands of a beneficent ruler, conquers the scheming shylock.

Attached: 1596203935397m.jpg (1024x938, 119.21K)

Typical big nosed negroid repeating this narrative.

>Was the French Revolution the beginning of the apocalypse?
what took you so long?

Attached: 1632701568824.jpg (850x400, 69.83K)

Chapter 5 of the curse of Canaan, it was the Masons.

youtube.com/watch?v=XCzXL6zUjKY&list=PLdGv_ee4Fc4q6ytzjPo2ag7VC8l7Ojo-W&index=5

The one Canadian who constantly spams shit about the Jesuits it Jonathan black, he literally has a Jewish Mum and a Millionaire Mason father. He also seems to know frighteningly little about the Jesuits despite his prolific posting. He didn't even know you had to be priest to join when quizzed.

>You could make the argument that a perfect monarchy, one which is only granted to noble Christian families, is protection against the subversive jew and their usury
> real monarchism has never been tried

Attached: tryingnottolaugh.jpg (251x242, 10.29K)

The French revolution consecrates the victory of the bourgeois over the nobles.
It also created an unhealthy egalitarianism where everyone thinks they have the right to everything without working and relies on the state to take from others to give to them

For many existence of Poland would be another con. But jokes aside for me anything that has the "revolution" in it usually doesn't end up well.

> real monarchism has never been tried
it was tried
and it was glorious

Attached: 1660506252716230.jpg (1600x1200, 570.68K)

see
Monarchism planted the seeds of its own undoing and the sick world we have today.

nah, you just personally don't like it, that's it
here
let me prove it to you
> White race planted the seeds of its own undoing and the sick world we have today
you are going to accept your version unconditionally, but try to recontextualize mine with issues of subversion, brainwashing, empathy (humble brag) etc

it's a simple friend enemy distinction and you are just defending what you know/love best

Attached: 2d54c5.jpg (1253x1080, 281.4K)

Oh goodie more failed ideologies whose only accomplishments were throwing millions of whites into the meat grinder and setting the stage for our current nightmare

>implying monarchy and christcuckery hasn’t done that already