Missiles are more cheaper than carriers.
Just let that sink in for a second.
Missiles are more cheaper than carriers
Connor Cooper
Gabriel Lopez
Ok
Keep me posted
Kayden Scott
Guns are cheaper than training soldiers. We should just dedicate the entire military budget to buying guns.
Thomas King
Did you think this was some profound idea?
Justin Anderson
nukes are cheaper than ships
cities can be rebuilt
hiroshima and nagasaki
look more beautiful now
please fire the missiles
Brody Wood
No. Having more access to guns is never a good idea
America has one of the HIGHEST murder rates in the world because of guns. You practically hear some kind of mass shooting happening in the USA on a daily basis. We even recently witnessed 10 innocent people killed by some deranged 4channer with an assault rifle in Buffalo, NY. If I were you, I wouldn't feel safe walking outside knowing there are psychos out there who are capable of pulling the trigger on a whim.
>Inb4 your a pussy
I am a veteran (a former Air Force combatant stationed in Camp Rogain, to be exact), so I have both the authority and experience to talk about this. My grandfather also fought for your freedoms by storming the beaches of Normandy. You DYEL losers aren't in a position to call me as such.
>Inb4 but what about muh Second Amendment
Let's face it, us ordinary folks don't need highly lethal weapons of war, such as the Assault Rifle 15. And our Founding Fathers never had automatic weapons in mind when they drafted the constitution. They meant less lethal Wild West shit like black powder muskets and swords.
>Inb4 but what about muh self defence
There are highly effective and specialized martial arts out there fit for that very purpose, such as Krav Maga, Systema, and Wing Chun. As a BJJ blue belt myself, if someone were to mug me on the streets, I could easily just submit him with a triangle choke and put the assailant to sleep. Strive to become like me. There is simply NO need to murder someone when defending yourself.
So tell me again, why are y'all against gun control?
Benjamin Wood
>Missiles are more cheaper than carriers.
>
>Just let that sink in for a second.
This from the country that had to convince pilot to just ram their fucking planes into US Ships because they we're so useless otherwise and they still failed.
Doesn't understand the sphere of projection a carrier provides within the battle group. One Aegis can detect any OTH launch and destroy it with one sortie from the carrier.
Now do something useful and post pics of your little mamasans in school skirts.
Ian Torres
“What is a kill chain”
How do you target missiles at a carrier if the carrier group never lets you get close enough to feed missiles tracking information?
Good luck dumbass
Ayden Hill
The chad Nimitz class carrier vs the virgin Ford class carrier
Thomas Robinson
found the tranny larper
Angel Miller
Bullets are more cheaper than soldiers.
RPGs are more cheaper than tanks.
Helicopters are more cheaper than MANPADS.
Anti-ship missiles are more cheaper than cruisers.
Just let that sink in for a second.
Brayden Walker
Guns are great! I love guns! No child's life is worth more than guns!
Christopher Russell
If people actually cared about keeping children safe we would ban fast food and homosexuality (most are pedophiles)
More kids are morbidly obese or diddled by faggots than shot by guns
Thomas Long
they're big and slow enough to be tracked real time via satellite, this is not 1945
Leo Watson
Yea but carriers make foreign nations shit themself.
Just park that outside a country's boarders and hear their underpants weigh heavier.
Jose Rogers
fucking women are more cheaper than sex dolls
just let that sink in for a second
Hudson Morales
You’re a clown, go look up how fast modern US aircraft carriers move
You’re not shooting a missile from 100+ KM away with no targeting guidance and hitting a modern carrier
Isaiah Wood
>more cheaper
Christopher Foster
>Camp Rogain
Nice pasta
Jeremiah Perry
Your carriers, maybe.
Elijah Taylor
Now that really depends
Austin Green
Whaat? Are you telling me that filling up a car with gas is cheaper than the car itself??
You nips sure are smart.
Dylan Bailey
It's not even sinking in.
A solider needs to be fed, watered, bathed, needs shelter to sleep in. Needs comfort to not lose their mind. They need to exercise their bodies, their minds and souls.
A bullet, a robot, a piece of technology, needs to be dusted, cleaned, and put back on the shelf.
This is just Common Sense. People aren't a resource - they are a costing responsibility. When you decide to open a prison, God doesn't automatically give you free food and shelter for your prisoner - you gotta pay that out of your own pocket.
It's why the Jews suffered in World War 2 - Concentration Camp means Prisoner of War. America put Germans and Japanese in camps in America. Land of the Free? Nope - into the camp you go - we're PARANOID!
But the Jews suffered because America hit the German Supply Lines. These supplies were gonna feed Jews. Well guess what, the Jews didn't get their supplies and starved. And they blamed the Germans for it too LOL
If we keep lying, propagating, and bullshitting around here - you'll never find the truth and be lost forever. Racism? Homophobia? Antisemitism? Transphobia? It's all the same LARP of "you don't know how hard my phony life is".
Adam Morris
uhmm, no, you cant take down a hypersonic missile, not even ground AA can do that, so planes can't do shit.
It all comes down to whoever has the most missiles in a conflict of developed powers. If you bring a carrier to a Russia/US or US/China war, they will be prime targets of hypersonic missiles and will be destroyed immidiately. So, you bring carriers only AFTER you have secured the coastline with your other navy, to establish air superiority over remaining enemy forces, thats all the use that carriers would have against a developed military.
No, not really. Carriers are a reusable thing, missiles are one-time thing only. So carriers are cheaper in the long run, especially if you fight some fucking savages with no fleet and no AA.
Hudson Lewis
missile travels at mach 10 your carriers are fucking scrap. they are nice for everything except the big one, where only submarines will matter at sea. you will not be fighting antisatellite warfare when the hypersonic naval strike occurs, the kill chain will be intact. it will just happen like pearl harbor and all of them, in the world, will sink within 5 minutes of each other, none at battle stations.
then the submarine fight will determine who wins the war. there is no other way to fight the war, so this is how the war will start when it is time.
Levi Martinez
Yeah lost of things are cheaper than carriers.
Daniel Young
Easy now, whitu piggu. No need to be more offensiver than necessariler.
Bentley Flores
Asians are cheaper than Europeans
Why haven't t we taken control of the world?
Ethan Cooper
>be fighting antisatellite warfare when the hypersonic naval strike occurs
How many memes can you fit in one post chang? Go back to writing chimpout posts, you don’t know shit except buzz words
Adam Hall
America's insistence on naval doctrine around carriers has become a considerable weakness in the age of global strike and unmanned drones.
There are simply very few places in the world that land based air, which is generally superior, cannot outnumber and overwhelm a carrier air group. Indeed most of those places are allied anyway and in terms of places where carriers are actually needed, there are none.
However sinking a carrier, much like the Russians experienced with the cruiser Moskva, represents a huge morale and political victory to near peer rivals, all of whom now have several effective anti-carrier strategies. Meanwhile America has continued to neglect other elements of naval power such as mine warfare, riverine warfare, and surface fire support. Another pacific war would, I fear, quickly reveal the USN as something of a very expensive boondoggle.
Logan Harris
If carriers aren't useful china won't be building them but I wonder if satellite and nukes( few nukes fired at the same time) combo can easily destroy a carrier strike group
Parker Edwards
All fixed!
Chase Sanders
>So carriers are cheaper in the long run, especially if you fight some fucking savages with no fleet and no AA.
Like people the US fights?
Jaxon Myers
Also supersonic is used for nuke delivery
Brandon Kelly
>uhmm, no, you cant take down a hypersonic missile,
Debunked Pyotor. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH STUPID FUCKING NIGGER SLAV HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH
Brandon Young
Because you were too slow to industrialize and failed to colonize the Americas.
Julian Wright
If someone is slinging nukes then their nation's lifespan isn't going to be much longer than the carrier they are targeting.
Liam Thomas
US had satellites parked over China for china’s entire development and you fools think China has an edge on the Us? Lmfao the US knows every Chinese submarine base and has known the entire time, go read the Snowden leaks
Or do you expect Russians to stop the Us? They are being raped by Ukrainians with no equipment or training
Fucking hilarious anti-American larpers here meanwhile americans fuck their wives irl
Colton Cruz
>more cheaper
Retard
Nathan Price
>take down a hypersonic missile,
It's entirely possible. Hypersonic missiles don't fly high only fast. Speed reduces detection time. If the missile is detected then an interceptor can be sent in front. Since hypersonic are fast they have zero stealth and speed creates multiple ways to track them.
Grayson Howard
>carriers
people on carriers are killing themselves already no missiles required
Leo Walker
ching chong ping pong kanichawa kimchi sushi samurai nihao
Connor Fisher
>America has one of the HIGHEST murder rates in the world because of guns
>because of guns
Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha. I bet you were the top of your class on the short bus.
Jacob White
Yes, please explain to me again how a hyper-sonic glide vehicle is expected to change it's directory by potentially several degrees in a matter of seconds going mach 10 without imploding. Heres a hint, it can't. You have no control of any object going at those speeds in the upper atmosphere, let alone the orders of magnitude thicker lower atmosphere. Hypersonics only work due to specific geometries that essentially force the vehicle to only face one direction otherwise it will be destroyed by heating and g-forces.
Easton Ross
I aporogizu
Nathan Moore
This, just please hit the predominantly black areas. Joe Bidens too much of a pussy to go to war and and he'll just make vague empty threats.
Luke King
>Bullets are more cheaper than soldiers.
Even at the individual soldier level you're talking about $1-2mil to train and another couple hundred thousand to feed and house, and then the salary on top of that.
And only about a quarter of a modern army are for actual combat, the rest are C4ISR, medical, admin, logistics, etc.
So really one soldier cost like $10million. And people are shocked by the sticker price of an APC (2-2.5mil).
Kayden Murphy
>we are working on it, see our meme website all shiny with some art on it, we will make it, now gib us funding
mhm
no
you don't even have a working prototype
currently noone has been able to do that tho. Theoretically possible, but no precedent exists.
Jason Wright
Can you transport men, aircraft, and weapons across the ocean on a missile?
No, you need ships. Just don't send them over there before you disable the enemy's ability to lob missiles at your ships.
Justin Davis
But I don't want it to sink in, it was so expensive
David Edwards
And china‘s carriers and missiles are complete shit.
Jack Anderson
>Helicopters are more cheaper than MANPADS.
No they aren't. Retard
Oliver Phillips
China has a lot more use for carriers than America does owing to the lack of overseas bases and friendly airfields.
Pretty sure China's plan to win a nuclear war is to be the first to rebuild.
Eli Green
you fucking mook read the last war games. it is all documented by think tanks in detail. just ask for sources or learn to read reddit. it is exactly as ive said.