Do you have a source on that?

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

Attached: wojak-762.png (840x854, 545.08K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-RMXaCWkPnQ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

This is from /r/Any Forums kek

>someone told me to stop spouting bullshit and i'm definitely not mad about it

>SOURCES GOT SOURCES

Attached: A0C60476-3151-447F-AB58-83BC38F02EC9.png (721x720, 16.46K)

That's been deboonked sweaty.

You've obviously never had a debate with leftie faggots. It's 100% okay for them to spew bullshit like multicultralism is good for society and it's okay for children to take shit like puberty blockers (even tho it fucks up their natural physiology) without giving you any sources because "lmao it's common sense chud!, It's not my job to educate you!". However, when you do the same they ALWAYS do what OP posted about.

This.
These retards think you need to be a biologist to determine what a woman is, even though a 4 year old can tell.

>However, when you do the same they ALWAYS do what OP posted about.
...they get mad at being told to stop spouting bullshit?
seems like my reply was an accurate summary of what this kind of post implies, and yet you attempted to turn it into an argument for some reason by telling me i don't know what's being talked about

We had the same thread yesterday.
Being able to back up your argument/opinion is necessary no matter were you stand politically.
Don't ramble out of your ass and yes I believe parts of what op says and don't be a sause hog every other sentence

What I said is truth.

The lefty will get 5 even with a calculator when adding 2+2

>related.

It is funny tho how in 2016 / 2015, the right wing parroted shit like "facts dont care about your feelings", and the left was always bitching about having a feeling about something, and now in 2022 / 2021, the right is the one basing shit on feelings instead of facts (sources) and the left is the one now doling out the "facts".

Attached: 1641402964095.png (653x562, 762.2K)

Did you even read my post?

Attached: onlyreliablesource.jpg (540x540, 32.43K)

Attached: revealedtomeinadream.jpg (854x61, 6.69K)

Attached: wheredoyougetyourinformationfrom.jpg (720x713, 77.06K)

youtube.com/watch?v=-RMXaCWkPnQ

Attached: source.jpg (1017x627, 382.09K)

The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where "feed" and "seed" both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Feeduck and Seeduck".

based if tru

I got you.

Attached: Capture.png (1103x154, 37.11K)

Does this vaccine have gluten in it?

there is nothing wrong with proof of claim