expose-news.com
VAERS data:
Jayden Cooper
Ryder Green
not looking good for the jabbies
Cameron Sanders
You know, it's a long-standing precept of contract law that contracts formed of fraud are unenforceable.
By that, I mean that Pfizer can be held liable despite governments signing it away under false pretense.
Connor Martinez
You would need to demonstrate the Pfizer knew about these risks at the time of contract formation. Or at least reasonably should have known, but that might be even harder considering the expedited development process precluding much of the normal testing procedure.
Christian Williams
I knew, and i'm reasonable.
Jack Collins
if someone murders millions, contract law is not the first thing that springs to my mind
Elijah Lopez
>You would need to demonstrate the Pfizer knew about these risks at the time of contract formation.
The rules are meaningless as they can be arbitrarily changed, all that matters is who is in power and who has the will.
Oliver James
You're technically right, but the alternative to not following a procedure due to concerns of bad faith is anarchy.
Owen Thomas
Absolutely agreed. But I don't generally speak the first thing that comes to my mind.
Brayden Robinson
Very true.
Very true.
Nathan Baker
Most important thread on the board
Hudson Ward
>VAERS data
Adam Garcia
>You would need to demonstrate the Pfizer knew about these risks at the time of contract formation.
lol. lmao. no refunds.
Henry Peterson
You lost the plot.
That subthread started with "contracts formed in fraud"
Xavier Torres
>VAERS data
>covid shots are dangerous
Yes.
Ryan Moore
>not looking goof for the jabbies
True samurai.
Andrew Adams
Anyone can make a VAERS report and get no consequences for false reporting, anti-vaxxers have abused the system en masse during the pandemic.
Anthony Gray
>memeflag discarded
always.
Nolan Edwards
>memeflag discarted
It's shimrit again.
Bentley Flores
Your country murders palestinians.
Connor Garcia
The current whistleblower trial has Pfizer arguing in its defence that because the government knew their data was incomplete/made up, they can’t be held liable.
Ian Morgan
Nicholas Ross
> PFIZER DATA
They collected data from 2020-12-01 to 2021-02-28.
> POST ATHORIZATION
So this post market survailance result is based on the first 3 months of the Vaccination authorization.
Post market analysis.
> Dec 2020 to Feb 2021.
> 126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped
> SHIPPED. NOT administered
> so only a SUBSET of the shipped were administered
> and these caused in 42,086 case reports containing 158,893 adverse events
> one report or patient can have multiple adverse reactions at once
> and these 42k reports are only reports of symptoms which happen more than 2% of the time of all adverse events
> all adverse events that occur less than 2% are not further investigated
> so they look only at 93,473 adverse events
> (see page 9-10)
> the rest is just mentioned on the last 9 pages of adverse events
> which happened at least once but didn't made up at least 2% of all adverse events.
phmpt.org
And this is ONLY pfizer not astra, JJ or moderna. ONLY pfizer.
Dylan Young
You are too stupid to understand confounding variables and likely were never trained on how to interpret statistics. For example, median age of cancer detection varies by type of cancer but is generally 65-70 years of age. Covid vaccines were prioritized to higher risk elderly populations, thus cancer rates are expectedly higher in vaccinated populations.
I wonder if you’ll understand now, probably not because you’re arguing in bad faith to begin with.