Attached: pbuh.png (199x296, 56.56K)
How can one man be so right about everything?
John Cook
Other urls found in this thread:
Adrian Fisher
PBUH
Josiah Wood
he sure as hell didn't get that mustache right.
Nicholas Davis
Creepy. This is the man that will haunt your dreams.
John Clark
That would be lovely
Thomas Clark
Wasn't he a Freemason? Or was pro-Freemason?
Bentley Sanchez
chcked
correct
Books in his own library:
>400 books about Hinduism
>200 Freemasonry books
>50 books about Judaism
>50 books about China
>50 books about Islam
Blake Allen
Interesting that a right-winger would be a Mason, considering how much hate Freemasonry gets in the right. According to his WIkipedia page, his thinking had a significant impact on Freemasonry. Wikipedia also lists him as an initiated Mason. Strange that Guenon doesn't get hate for this.
Jayden James
Repent, in the name of the most merciful Lord.
Dylan Lopez
>still believing in the right left dichotomy in anno dominus 2022
NGMI
Jaxon Sanchez
okay I leave now
John Thomas
Goodbye, sir
Parker Robinson
guenon is based. anyone saying otherwise is a deluded christcuck
Colton Garcia
True kek
Ryder Garcia
He wrote extensively on Christian Esotericism and had immense respect for Catholicism, what do you mean?
Samuel Fisher
he chose islam for a reason. he had to leave europe
Aiden Carter
At least from what I've heard
Dylan Jones
Even Evola believed in the legitimacy of freemasonic initiation towards the end of his life
Zachary Hughes
This lad looks like hp lovecraft who was based on some aspects ie incredibly racist and admitted he admired fascism
Justin Anderson
this is a pretty good read:
livingislam.org
He literally predicted the whole anti-traditionalism from the left and the "tradcath" phenomenon that's occuring as well
>The previous chapter was concerned with matters that, like everything else belonging essentially to the modern world, are radically anti-traditional; but in a sense they go even further than ‘anti-tradition’, understood as being pure negation and nothing more, for they lead toward the setting up of something that can more appropriately be called a ‘counter-tradition’.
>The distinction between the two is similar to that made earlier between deviation and subversion, and it corresponds to the same two phases of anti-traditional action considered as a whole. ‘Anti-tradition’ found its most complete expression in the kind of materialism that could be called ‘integral’, such as that which prevailed toward the end of the last century;[11] as for the ‘counter-tradition’, we can still only see the preliminary signs of it, in the form of all the things that are striving to become counterfeits in one way or another of the traditional idea itself.
Thomas Long
Chichvarkin?
Jordan Taylor
Unauthorized Use.