Anarchy is the answer. Truly. It is the final boss of political ideologies and hopefully Any Forums realizes this soon

the amount of bullshit the old gaurd have to go through to just keep society together without it collapsing into absolute chaos is quite astounding. I think that when you catch them at just the right time, they would be the first to accept how much bullshit is involved in the very system they support. but this is what we can do until we fuck off and build something better.
anarchy is need to dismantle an ideology and recycle its good parts into a more syncretic ideology or dialectical synthesis.
anarchy is important becuase it is a time that leads us to values that really matter. but a perpetual state of anarchy as ideal human society handicaps humanity and keeps them under a societal bottleneck when it comes to progress.

Anarchy is a faggot.
A raving, screaming poofter, shoving shit and cum-encrusted objects up its raggedy little arse.
...and so are you. I'll knock your fucking cunt right in, gay paki pedophile.

kek
That retard didn't even know how to throw a molotov.

Attached: 1633539841801.png (613x677, 73.1K)

You want anarchy to try and make some impossible stateless utopia. I want anarchy because I fucking hate humanity and want to break shit.

We are not the same.

Attached: 003CA1B9-9F0C-4F51-BBBB-F2419946B432.jpg (640x480, 11.12K)

(1/2)
States are units of opposition. Think of them like organizational arms races. A strong state arises because of the presence of existing strong states and the need for concentration of power to both protect and project the interests of a unified racial collective.

Families will exist. Tribes will exist because a few thousand people can still be a direct family within a couple generations. Among a few tribes who all know and care for one another because everyone knows one another by name and by reputation, you cannot halt the formation of polities that are multiple thousands of people. That was how the Greek city states arose, was a few tribes banded together and built fortified settlements to rule over the already existing agricultural population that they had henceforth subjugated. You cannot stop people from knowing each other and living together in a common area. Simply by this fact alone, an organizational hierarchy will form in an organic manner based on need, locale, resources, religion, and military power.

You could argue that this arms race will never happen because people just won't form states, but it becomes readily evident that when loose, unaffiliated people become eventually surrounded by strong states, they either decide to form their own or they are subsumed by one or more of the larger surrounding states.

This is not up for debate since it is simply politics, or human power activity. In fact, all politics deals with human power activity, and if you are at a disadvantage in nature, you risk losing your sovereignty. When you operate at a power disadvantage, then your very life is at risk.

This is the reason why America never formed a very strong state prior to World War II. There was no other power on the continent that necessitated such concentration of power, unlike in Europe, where the frontiers are much smaller, much more concentrated.

Attached: the interminable exile.jpg (768x574, 113.15K)

Look it’s not real anarchy if there’s an “ideology” and “literature” and “ethics”. You can’t pick and choose which laws you follow, that just makes you an entitled smarmy little faggot. Either you follow all of them or none at all. Today’s anarchists are too buddy buddy with communists, most of them will argue that it’s one and the same but different, with a complete disregard for history. Marx shit on Proudhon, and Proudhon deserved it for trying to codify chaos and became its sole shekeldaddy. There’s no political spectrum at work. That’s all for bored college educated assholes to ponder, the same way instagram thots ponder on pictures of expensive meals.

Gay
Gay and AIDS
Fuck off

dumbshit tween LARP once people need to eat, final boss is keeping your community healthy while chasing off the demons

Attached: 43243_432423.jpg (616x465, 133.93K)

(2/2)
This idea that all peoples everywhere adhere to a similar sense of a modern western liberalism, that people inherently revile authority and thus will destroy it is ludicrously modern and ridiculous. Need I add modern?

This suspended state of anarchy will only work if you were an objective third party analyzing the goings-on of the people, continually interfering to prevent families and like kindred blood from settling in common areas. Either this, or you would need to engineer some class of human wherein sexual dimorphism did not exist, thus eliminating the need for male and female pair bonding, thus eliminating the family as a social unit.

Assuming the free movement of peoples in a land with no state and thus no control over habitation, the moment a few powerful families begin to reside in an area and control resources is the moment that you begin to see rudimentary organization. Couple this with the development of folk religions that claim supranatural ordination, and you will not be able to halt the formation of more centralized power, which everyone will most likely applaud because it is their family and their family is large and they control the land.

In addition, while even this aristocratic structure will result in a degree of traditional blood duals, backstabbing, and even feuds when the familial lines begin to diverge, this will not result in a destruction of the very institution of the entrenched power, but a simple alteration of hands in a de facto position, whether monarchic or diarchic or some other variation.

Attached: napoleon-gardener-st-helena-tt-width-564-height-454-crop-1-bgcolor-ffffff-lazyload-0.jpg (564x454, 122.62K)

Go suck hot turds out an AIDS victim's arse
You have earned it
You deserve it

The only way anarchy would work is to educate literally every citizen in self sustenance. It’s the dependence on the state that creates a government. And sometimes self sustenance would involve self defense, because without a judicial system there really isn’t much of an incentive to be considerate towards others besides genuine human kindness, which is less and less apparent these days.

Anarchy is never the endgoal. It is meerly a tool for peasents to overthrow an overreaching state.

The state has always been at the end of the road. Not even tribes of niggers live without some form of rules.
Once the opressive state has been overthrown another one knocks at the door.

Prolonged rule of cruelty of the masses in form of anarchy has never worked, ever.

Attached: feelsweirdman.png (1024x1024, 1.88M)

This. Verbal diarrhea and grandiose self importance is the downfall of everything man has ever attempted.

(3/2 what the fuck)
nless an exterior state exists which is similarly concentrated in power and scope and possesses the organized capability of military overcoming the first state, that is. But then again, even when the first state is partitioned or subsumed, there is still a state because people trend towards organization. I should specify, certain races tend towards organization at different levels, but even the negroes, typically unorganized specimens, had kingdoms.

A similar point could be made about factories. "Well surely no one will stand for being made to fit machine parts onto other machine parts for 8 hours a day 7 days a week!" you might say, and you might be right.

But factories, as terrible as they are, exist and persist, because what happens is when you open Pandora's box, everyone opens Pandora's box, and then if you refuse to use the evil that comes out, you will be subsumed in the torrential wave that is to follow.

I detest factories; I think the labor there is rather dehumanizing and ill befits Aryan man's natural inclination towards open skies and open fields. But if we refused to use factories, then the only production we would have for weapons of war and other similarly politically important things would be smaller and less efficient.

We do things that harm our nature for reasons of power, but there is a tolerable line there. People might hate being under the thumb of some supreme authority they perceive as unjust and unfair, but depending on the situation, they would rather detest being partitioned by their neighboring kingdom, and so they belong as part of the group which suits their interests tolerably.

And I do mean suits their interests, because every people has an innate destiny, which the state should be there to carry out with gusto.

Attached: imperium2.jpg (841x1397, 250.63K)

Both of you lack the attention span to read anymore than 5 words because your brains have been fried by cheap entertainment and tik tok.