Why don't democratic politicians show their face in public?
Why don't democratic politicians show their face in public?
Because they are popular leaders of course, they represent the will of the people according to themselves!
Spengler was right about the low vulgarity of the nazis in playing to the degenerate mob.
You can say the same about Trump's appeal to vulgarity as well, to rile the masses with things they want to hear.
And we saw what good that did when the time came. People are sheep. Seeking the adoration of the masses is pure vanity.
At the end of the day, it worked. Good luck convincing the brainwashed otherwise, they are permanently trapped in a state of hysteria after their leader was taken from them.
Nazis shut down much of the degeneracy going on in Germany at the time retard.
>it worked
It didnt work for either men tho. Both lost everything and achieved nothing that outlasted their brief time in power. The real redpill is realizing the masses are scum and representative government is the worst form of government. If power rests on the fickleness of the mob then its not real power.
>Caesar didn’t have real power
>It didnt work for either men tho
It worked very well for Hitler.
What didn't work for Hitler was invading Russia.
Ceasar was murdered on the senate floor. It was Augustus and his grip on the legions as well as killing all rivals that had real power that was emulated by the emperors and kings of europe for the next 2000 years as the ideal. Not love of mob. Even americas founders found that kind of low policing to be unseemly.
Mostly because they aren't elected and don't have the people's best interests at heart.
>It worked very well for Hitler.
No it didnt. Who fought harder? Germans and their love of hitler or the soviets and their fear of stalin? Hitler himself said it wasn't the germans and they deserved to lose at the end.
Running a nation has nothing to do with the interests of the people. The fact that America has to constantly lie about being a Democracy is to blame, as it is really a Republic.
Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any philosopher kings that could ever make decisions on behalf of Americans, for that would be the ideal way to govern. There is a shortage of wise leaders in DC.
Do we have any, or is the power of the state too corrupting at this point?
>low vulgarity
Perhaps the last wise leader may have been Obama, for the very fact that he was truly a Machiavellian statesman. I am pretty sure he is running the country through Biden, much like how Putin ran Russia through Medvedev that one time.
Because everyone hates them and they'd be shot in the face by some schizo with a rifle
looks like quite the party on the LEFT side of the image you posted, MisTer
Hitler literally never said this you faggot
This is what he said:
After six years of war which, despite all setbacks, will one day go down in history as the most glorious and heroic manifestation of the struggle for existence of a nation, I cannot abandon the city which is the capital of this Reich. Since our forces are too meager to withstand the enemy's attack and since our resistance is being debased by creatures who are as blind as they are lacking in character, I wish to share my fate with that which millions of others have also taken upon themselves by remaining in this city. Further, I shall not fall into the hands of the enemy who requires a new spectacle, presented by the Jews, for the diversion of the hysterical masses.
I have therefore decided to stay in Berlin and there to choose death voluntarily when I determine that the position of the Fuhrer and the Chancellery itself can no longer be maintained. I die with a joyful heart in the knowledge of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our peasants and workers and of a contribution unique in the history of our youth which bears my name.
>Caesar didn’t have real power
Caesars power was the Legions.
And anyone can get assassinated.
His assassins then all got hunted down and murdered soon after.
The populists with the mobs were the Gracchi brothers.
>Who fought harder? Germans and their love of hitler or the soviets and their fear of stalin?
A question with no certain answer.
Both fought extremely hard for their nation.
The Germans lost not out of willpower, but out of being outnumbered and outresourced.
>Hitler himself said it wasn't the germans and they deserved to lose at the end.
A fictional quote.
>I have therefore decided to stay in Berlin and there to choose death voluntarily when I determine that the position of the Fuhrer and the Chancellery itself can no longer be maintained. I die with a joyful heart in the knowledge of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our peasants and workers and of a contribution unique in the history of our youth which bears my name.
slavery ws a joke bro, get over ITTTT
>A question with no certain answer.
A question that was answered by history. Same as your love of populism and representative governance. Thats all a joke. Real leaders dont need seek or want adulation of adoring sycophants. Hitler played into that and was just as foolish for it as any red team vs blue politician today. You will never achieve anything when power rests on the ephemeral loyalties of the ill informed normie. Rather than trying to desperately justify how a broken system could maybe work under some ideal condition you need to just accept that the whole concept is flawed.
Is this from when the Soviets met up with the Germans after conquering Poland?
yep, the fucking apes