>When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force.And force my friends is violence.The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.
Was he right?
Lieutenant Jean Rasczak
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Is there any worldview that does not assign violence as the highest form of authority? Whether it's the commies sending their footsoldiers to crush your throat with their boots or God Himself damning you for eternity, everyone recognizes that violence is a primordial truth.
Counter point
Um that's BULL.SHIT. Mm hmm.
>snaps fingers
>das rite!
My boo Shanequanet on the left got the balls end of that cucumber. That bitch Washanda got a tiny little head to blow.
The only definition of "government" or "state" is the actor that has the monopoly on the legitimate use of violence. This answer is accepted internationally.
He's right but voting only matters if the system isn't rigged (too much). When you have a demented pedo that gets elected by mail-in "votes" then your vote doesn't mean shit.
It's self-evident. The book is better.
Exactly right.
>100_percent.jpg
Voting never meant shit. The deep state runs the show. Democrats, and Republicans are both a part of it.
Yes.
Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun (Chinese: 枪杆子里面出政权; pinyin: Qiānggǎnzi lǐmiàn chū zhèngquán) is a phrase which was coined by Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong. The phrase was originally used by Mao during an emergency meeting of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on 7 August 1927, at the beginning of the Chinese Civil War.[1]
Mao employed the phrase a second time on 6 November 1938, during his concluding speech at the sixth Plenary Session of the CCP's 6th Central Committee. The speech was concerned with both the Civil War and the Second Sino-Japanese War, which had commenced the previous year.
In 1960, a portion of the 1938 speech was excerpted and included in Mao's Selected Works, with the title "Problems of War and Strategy". However, the central phrase was popularized largely as a result of its prominence in Mao's Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung (1964)
en.wikipedia.org
it was col. dubois actually, but, yeah.
>b-but the ability to peacefully negotiate is ackshually the best blah blah blah
It's all predicated on the idea that if we can't get along, we will wipe the other out.
This is why the left and the right just bumble around voter ID laws and blockchain voting. It is like steroids in baseball, every one of these fuckers is juicing their votes and trading off elections.
Does anyone really think John McCain deserved to be re-elected 5 times?
>incoherent bullshit sayings
whatever grandpa
he's right in that violence and force is the supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived
but
>when you vote, you are exercising political authority; you're using force
isn't correct, and if it's applicable at all, it's only applicable to a system somewhat like Heinlein's
force is force; the threat of force, or force by proxy is force
when you call the police on somebody threatening your property, that is the application of force by proxy of the state, which often assumes a near-monopoly on violence
voting by itself, without the prerequisite of merit, or without the implied threat of force, is not force
if we vote, and the results of that vote are ignored, or falsified, is there an implicit threat of force?
no, there is not; it's evident we would do nothing about it but bitch
therefore, merely voting is not force
voting with political authority is force, which carries with it responsibilities and duties of the application of the implied force, should that ever prove neccesary
Something that I'll remember for a very long time is watching streams of CHAZ during the riots in 2020. Watching protesters get mugged live on camera and instinctively start screaming "HELP ME!! CALL THE POLICE!!". Some people don't want to negotiate.
Democracy, you fucking sperg.
Yeah, the intent behind democracy definitely isn't entrusting your political leaders to exert violence on your behalf.
Just kidding, it is. Dipshit English teacher weeb.
>Democracy
All democracies have police forces you massive dumbass
When you vote, you're using the threat of violence to negotiate a non-violent alternative.
Fully.
Laws don't matter, enforcement matters. A law essentially doesn't exist if it doesn't get enforced and a law that isn't codified certainly does exist if it is enforced. Enforcement is violence. If you learn nothing else in your entire life, learn that.
How did American democracy decide to end hostilities against Japan in the 40's?
heinlein was always right