fMRI pulls thoughts from brain, AI interprets with uncanny realism. What would they find in your brain? Innocent people have nothing to hide, right?
dailymail.co.uk
HOW LONG UNTIL THIS IS MANDATORY?
Lucas Flores
Other urls found in this thread:
Samuel Torres
Wyatt Wood
From earlier efforts. Obviously they've gotten better at this
Blake Gomez
i dont care
Adam Bell
A special type of MRI that makes scans into images? I'm more interested in how that works.
William Ortiz
neurologist here
lemme tell you how this works
>they show you an image
>they see how your neurons fire
>they ask you to think of that same image in your head for a couple minutes
>they see how your neurons fire
>they compare the two images
>feed it into an "AI" which is basically a script that swaps photoshop layers around based on where/how much the neurons fired
>they tell the journalists it drew a face from scratch when all it really did was play face/off with some prefab stock photos based on shitty data to begin with
James Perry
>neurologist here
hey can i ask you some questions about sciatica
Justin Bailey
>What would they find in your brain?
Incomprehensible insanity
schizo gang rise up
Jeremiah Taylor
>I'm more interested
Article has some details but no link to further detail.
It's probably upcoming in a peer reviewed journal
Ryder Hughes
addendum
do you know that we still don't know how the fuck visual hallucinations work? there is no mechanism that explains them in schizophrenics and people who trip on acid and shrooms. all we have is that the eye slows down a couple ms and serotonin activity.
Bentley Wright
roboticist here
can confirm
its no so much an AI as a glorified searching algorithm
Robert Lopez
Why is science journalism so bad? They consistently get things wrong, or just publish the most wild, bullshit stuff imaginable.
Remember when they said NASA or whatever had discovered microbial life on Mars or somewhere? Also, every other week we find out butter, eggs, wine, chocolate, etc., are either the key to a long life, or a cause of cancer. God I hate journalists.
Dominic Sanders
>when all it really did
Note other studies did this in real time while the subject watched a video.
Camden Hill
The picture gets clearer as the AI receives more data?
Sort of like self driving vehicles
Henry Richardson
They did this with cats a while ago.
Weirdly enough, all the human faces looked strangely cat-like.
Oliver Ross
>Why is science journalism so bad?
because journalism is bad
unironically some of the best journalist-like channels for science are stuff like numberphile, PBS spacetime, etc...
Kurzgesagt is decent but tends to deviate and discuss social issues
Nathaniel Johnson
You’re a little late to the show kid, your wifi router has been reading your mind since forever and your thoughts are just part of a control loop developed by Honeywell. It has to be this way
Carson Thomas
>with uncanny accuracy
kek, with uncanny valley maybe. it’s garbage.
John Scott
cant tell if schzo or irnoic
William Allen
they measure bloodflow and then some kikes jew the system by editing the image files in photoshop for 15 min for their sheckels.
Henry Jones
>it’s garbage.
But keeps getting better
youtube.com
Jonathan Cox
>uncanny accuracy
No?
Thomas Perry
Just wait until the normies learn this can be done wirelessly.
Christian Foster
>Just wait
Just wait until they perfect putting thoughts INTO peoples brains.
Parker Taylor
I find these more interesting and more accurate. The OP's did cut/paste with random photos like "thispersondoesnotexist".