Since the hypersonic missile has made carriers useless, why does america still build carriers...

Since the hypersonic missile has made carriers useless, why does america still build carriers? Seems like wasteful spending. What can a carrier do that a destroyer can’t?

Attached: 0FE66D57-71BE-491C-B69A-846227969BC1.jpg (1170x778, 817.91K)

There's no way that's not an image of Tonka toy missile trucks.

hey Any Forums pass user
how are you?

they can carry planes

>Since the hypersonic missile has made carriers useless, why does america still build carriers?
Jobs program. It puts multiple high-tech and low-tech production sectors into work, gives minorities on-the-job training, all very good for the economy.

Attached: us_navy_female_recruits.jpg (2632x3696, 2.21M)

>muh hypersanic missiles
Meme technology that doesn't even work right
>What can a carrier do that a destroyer can’t?
Sit on a spot in the ocean indefinitely with the army and air force of a moderately sized country, that it can deploy against anyone within hours

Personally I think we need to revisit aircraft carrier submarines, but until that day comes surface carriers are the kings of force projection

>why does america still build carriers?
To attack and intimidate countries that don't have such missiles

Since the hypersonic missile has made carriers useless, why does china still build carriers?

funny how the countries with muh hecking hypersonics are still building and maintaining carriers. Hypersonics are hard to guide and control and there is no way they're gonna hit a ship moving at 20 knots from hundreds of miles away. Stop falling for chink and vatnik propaganda. Both are way behind on military tech so they make up wonder weapons that supposedly make the same things they keep building obsolete

>Meme technology that doesn't even work right
Lmao cope you dumb muttshit zog puppet

>What can a carrier do that a destroyer can’t?

uh... carry.

>Since the hypersonic missile has made carriers useless

Attached: op9e3n61udf21.jpg (682x900, 93.75K)

>Outspeeds its own guidance
Like said, if hypersanic missiles were the ultimate technology that changs and vatniks say they are, why are both counties building carriers?

Multiple wargames have showed that attack submarines are the real threat that aircraft carriers have to worry about, not retarded inaccurate meme rockets

>a missile system that misses its target by 24 (TWENTY FUCKING FOUR) miles isn't a meme technology

Attached: 1650759635103.jpg (510x494, 50.82K)

We all know that "lookism" is a real phenomenon, where the attractive have an easier life in every measurable metric. I have noticed that all those females are butt ugly. They therefore have none of the advantages of attractiveness. SO for them, it's either working at the Dollar Store, being a ghetto street whore, or homelessness.

literal plastic mock ups. North Korea does the same stupid shit for their military parades. For all we know, all these wunderwaffe weapons don't even exist at all.

now plaster them with makeup like your average woman nowadays and you will have white knights flocking to them asking how to donate to their only fans, make up is truly evil

Attached: 1660664767929931.jpg (611x614, 70.11K)

looks like a tranny Elliot Roger

Aircraft carriers can still be used to invade backward countries without hypersonic missiles. For example, to countries in Africa, South America or Europe.

It's just gender bent Elliot Rogers. Fucking dick choppers washed the term genderbent from a conceptual idea used in art to a mental illness. That isn't a tranny, that's just Elles Rogers. Not everything is trannies.

A netter question is why does china still build carriers. It’s because they aren’t useless. Btw unless they are loaded with a nuke it is transonic missiles that are useless

>why
we've been on autopilot for a while now

You may be right but the technology is evolving. On a smaller scale you are seeing Russians use drones correct artillery. Why don't you think that similar principles won't apply for long range missile deployment?

Are you saying the missle doesn't know where it isn't?

Didn't Russia blow up a reddit battalion with a precise strike with one of these only a couple of months ago? Seems like the next major war will be a WW1 moment where all the big powers will quickly realise that their military expenditure has been worthless (which Americans should have already realised after afghanistan)

>why does america still build carriers?
b8

>hypersonic missiles made carriers useless
No they didn't.
It might restrict their use, but you still need large floating things that allow you to project air power far away. If you're USA that is.

Russians don't really need them.

Tech evolves, but unless you can demonstrate that China plausibly has the capability to develop that technology then you're positing a slippery-slop fallacy. China cannot build chips powerful enough to guide hypersonic missiles and the development of such chips is sabotaged by China's entire economy being endemically corrupt.

>Didn't Russia blow up a reddit battalion with a precise strike with one of these only a couple of months ago?
No.

So they use their magic weapons against a handful of volounteers, but not against relevant targets? I'm sure that fucking factory where they repaired tanks would have been a good use for precision instead of something that only hit nearby mall and park

I have a feeling you'll find out soon enough, Ivan

>What can a carrier do that a destroyer can’t?
Deliver air support to the region. Destroyers are basically useless nowadays since you just need to get a couple jets in that timezone to sink them

Sorry but that sounds like cope. There are different targeting strategies they can use. They can use high altitude drones or submarines to acquire targets before they launch their missiles. They need not be guided mid-flight.

>China cannot build chips powerful enough to guide hypersonic missiles and the development of such chips is sabotaged by China's entire economy being endemically corrupt.
Imagine being in this much denial. Its not 1965 dude, you dont need "theoretical chips" to have some level of control over hypersonic missles

Hypersonic missile can't get through aegis still. It's automated magic. Good luck chinks.

To my knowledge USA is the only country that has been equipping it's destroyers with high powered laser weapons. Those should be able to shoot down hypersonics.

Takes time until old tech is phased out

Attached: 1657942772008.jpg (480x360, 37.52K)

Front middle is a solid slampig

The updated aegis can track hypersonic and throw up enough shit to knock them down, it is a superior system.

i've never read a good post by a bong

Lasers are the worst weapons in existance. Photons carry no mass so you are dealing with pissant levels of efficiency to delivery comparitively no energy. Flak has always been the preffered way to stop something moving fast becase KE=m*v^2