Opinions on Destiny?

He is funny but more often than not is not debating/commenting in good faith. He's a sneaky rat who's not interested in the truth.

His entire arguments stem from bad faith, misinterpretation, grasping at straws, or arguing semantics.

Example
You might point out that a car driving by is red
but lo and behold destiny the retard comes by and smugly points out
>but you can't actually tell when red turns to orange so red doesn't really exist
>what is red? define it, can't define it? Well then you can't say the car is read

Every one of his arguments is essentially this
He gets so self absorbed in the meaning of words, or technicalities that don't really apply practically in any part of life, that he really only wins in arguing impractical semantics.
Its gotten so bad he may as well just say "you can't even prove you aren't a brain in a jar so you can't possibly make any arguments whatsoever"

Hes honestly a retard who spergs out and talks quick when he's losing.

His biggest loss was arguing against fuentes on Ukraine. I cringed everytime he spoke.

Attached: IMG_3425.jpg (1024x1024, 99.56K)

A fine example of a midwit.

These threads need to automatically be deleted.

you must be over 18 to post here

He's a self confessed and proud cuck who lets his wife get fucked by other streamers. But occasionally he has a take that's not absolutely absurd

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-08-21 at 8.28.47 PM.png (342x508, 228.61K)

I will never care about the opinions of someone weaker or browner than me

Before Plato, the word "sophist" could be used as either a respectful or contemptuous title. It was in Plato's dialogue, Sophist, that the first record of an attempt to answer the question "what is a sophist?" is made. Plato described sophists as paid hunters after the young and wealthy, as merchants of knowledge, as athletes in a contest of words, and purgers of souls. From Plato's assessment of sophists it could be concluded that sophists do not offer true knowledge, but only an opinion of things. Plato describes them as shadows of the true, saying, "the art of contradiction making, descended from an insincere kind of conceited mimicry, of the semblance-making breed, derived from image making, distinguished as portion, not divine but human, of production, that presents, a shadow play of words—such are the blood and the lineage which can, with perfect truth, be assigned to the authentic sophist". Plato sought to distinguish sophists from philosophers, arguing that a sophist was a person who made his living through deception, whereas a philosopher was a lover of wisdom who sought the truth. To give the philosophers greater credence, Plato gave the sophists a negative connotation.

Attached: 1479453041464.jpg (681x700, 81.89K)

sorry man, there's no search bar here and I wanted to gage an opinion
I'm 19 faggot kys

Watched only one of his videos, absolute cuck faggot