Um yes they have working organs

>Um yes they have working organs
>Um no they’re not even alive

Attached: 9EE2070F-0CC0-40C5-BB94-0A460C740B03.jpg (750x953, 173.02K)

Hey I've seen that movie. It was alright.

Seems like a regulatory nightmare if you'd want to do it IRL though.

Matrix

Why do supposed right wing men like movies made by jewish trannies so much?
You killed the west, this is just the result

Yes this is just the Island, and another movie that came before it

Well that's revolting.

You WILL grow your offspring in an artificial womb.

I will never understand why it’s controversial to kill something with the neurological sophistication of a trout. Or in this case, less sophistication than that.

I WANNA GO TO THE ISLAND! YOU PROMISED!!

Attached: Starkweather.jpg (648x365, 52.74K)

>Um no they’re not even alive
This is one of the biggest conservatard strawmen. Literally no one on any side of the abortion debate believes or argues that fetuses/embryos are "not alive."

>oy vey goy, it's just a trout we promise
How do you suppose they will accomplish this?

Attached: images.jpg (230x219, 10.92K)

A trout doesn't have the potential to become the next einstein
A human embryo does

>omg dumb conservatard, we aren't saying it's not ALIVE, we're saying it's not a human life!
you are one dumb clump of cells

I bet you could tweak some genes and keep humans in a fetus like state being fed via the umbilical cord. they would poop and pee and so the amniotic fluid would need to be cleaned from time to time.

Getting warmer. It's human, in the sense that it has human DNA. What it isn't, is a person.

Mutts aren't people either so what's your point?

because magical sky daddy will get mad, duh. Nevermind it being used to save people that need organ transplants

>uhm yeah it's a human life, but NOT a person
The mental gymnastics it takes to come to a position like this are simply astounding.

why would they do this when the West and China have had black market organ harvesting operations going on for decades? Is this just a way for normie basedcucks to accept it now?

A person has consciousness, a fetus doesn't.

So, it is like the good old organ trafficking?

>>Um no they’re not even alive
But...muh bacteria on Mars!!!

LOLOLOLOL of course the child is alive.

That's part of it, but it's also a matter of compatibility. Donor organs are attacked by the body's immune system, theoretically a cloned organ made from your own DNA would not have this issue and would result in much better chances of long-lasting health.

>A person has consciousness, a fetus doesn't.
So people in comas are fair game too? Can we harvest their organs? Actually this is much simpler, since coma patients have a realistic chance of never regaining consciousness, whereas a fetus (unless acted upon by an outside force) will.

Attached: 6daca307-f186-4d40-b212-a746356ad7a6_text.gif (400x167, 569.77K)

>23andMe fulfillment and acquisition office

Attached: 1644529357127.gif (499x207, 1.65M)