Since the attempt on his life, and assassination of his daughter, Any Forums once more sees a resurgence in discussion on Dugin. As usual, the unending debate regarding his alleged influence on Putin is at the forefront. With the same 2 extremist positions spammed over and over. >He's a nobody! He has no influence! He's a fringe lunatic! Nobody in Russia knows his name! He's only known in the West! >He's "Putins brain"! neo-Rasputin! The official ideologue of Putin and Russia! Mastermind of Putin and the invasion of Ukraine! When we ignore the extreme hype built around him by journalists and politicians in the West, looking at him without the above narrative infecting our perspective, and trying to see what has brought these radically opposing views of him, the following image makes it self clear.
If you look at his writings from the 1990's until today, it's hard to deny that the ideological framework and rhetoric widely used by Putin and the Russian state today is almost "taken" from his pages. Some of his books almost seems like they parrot the official line, but it's rather the opposite, since when the ideas presented in them were first formulated, those words and concepts were not at all used ins such a way on such a high level.
This does not mean that Putin is literally talking with Dugin, asking him for advice on what to do, being influenced by his lectures. Rather, the ground before the Russian leadership has been paved with a coherent framework to form new Russian ideology in a country that has already "overcome" the 3 political theories of Modernity: Communism (USSR), Fascism (WWII), and today Liberalism, which Russia has clearly broken with.
Dugin is pretty clear when he insists that the ideas he discusses and presents are not "his ideas", i.e. not "Duginism". The "4th Political Theory" (2009) is not his "Mein Kampf", but rather the result of analysis of Russia and the world. In the link below we can see how he himself describes his alleged influence on Putin: youtube.com/watch?v=Wk52o-khc-E&t=595s (9:55 and onward)
In this other link below of another interview, we can also see this (ignore of course the hysterical j*urnalist inserting his unwarranted opinions) >(note also, that at 3:45, what the j*urnalist should have said is not "In Dugins mind an independent Ukraine [...]", but "Dugin agrees with the Geopolitical heavyweights of the West, such as such as Halford Mackinder, and top political advisors of the leadership of the US, such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, in that an independent Ukraine […]”. A classical case of the newly dubbed “Celebration Parallax” twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1312024448845873152) youtube.com/watch?v=Du7fOoW_euE At 4:00 and forward especially, some context is provided which aligns with what he describes in the other interview.
This should hopefully clear up some things regarding Dugins influence or lack thereof. His person is clearly not a powerful figure, and he does not have “control” or sway over Putin in any direct way. But that does not mean that his ideas and writings can be entirely dismissed, as they have since long, clearly explained and “predicted” the necessary future course for Russia, which we today can clearly see in the liberation of the Ukraine, the break with what Putin now calls >"the neo-colonial, neo-liberal totalitarianism of the globalist elite” , and in the burgeoning Multipolar World Order.
As an aside, its pretty interesting how his 4PT, which seeks to overcome all 3 ideologies of Modernity (of which, Liberalism was the victorious one), trying to overcome the narrow "left-center-right" model which exists only and entirely >within< Modernity, he is called both a "Fascist" (3PT) in the West (where the Right reads him), "Communist" (2PT) in Latin-American and Africa (where socialists make up the main opposition to the globalist empire of the US), and "cuck/niggerlover/tranny/etc" (aka Liberal, 1PT) on the Internet, such as Any Forums.
The extremely limited and artificially boxed in trap of only accepting the already defeated and ideologically bankrupt enemies of Liberalism as the only alternatives to its global rule proves itself quite clearly. And its no wonder that the elite of the West are the ones that freaked out about him the most. A new, not pre-defeated challenger to the logic and ideology of Liberalism!? In the Post-Modern era where Liberalism is supposed to have "won" and mankind reached the "End of History", awaiting only the post-human AI singularity (hence, Global Homogeneity, Globohomo)!?
Heres what he himself has to way on that matter: youtube.com/watch?v=-AVVipiukPI >21:32 (especially at 24:29) to 30:55 (or all the way to 51:04, for a more in-depth breakdown)
Dugin first gained prominence with his book "Foundations of Geopolitics" (1997), where he essentially founded the entire scholarly field of Gepolitics in Russia, as this type of analysis had gone against the Communist dogma of the USSR. The military was the first to take note of this, as they were struggling to comprehend why on earth the US and NATO kept expanding and trying to dominate Russia, even when they had dismantled their empire, ideologically converted to Liberalism, and extended their hand as a partner to the New World Order.
In the book, aside from laying out the titular foundations of Geopolitics, he also provided a "blueprint" for Russia to regain its position as an Empire on the global (super power) scale. Many point to his encouragement of supporting all dissident movements of all types in order to cause chaos in the US, but comparing his views of the 1990’s with todays the emergence of Trump and growing resistance of half of the US population against Globohomo, he has adjusted his views on the US in a logical way.
I pretty much do not give a shit about this guy. Here is the run down >he is a grifter that ran with the ideas people have had of russia rising to become the next dominant culture He stole someone else's idea, made some money and got famous.
Jaxon Bell
Here are some texts that should be read to understand his thought surrounding his view on the Left and Right, Nationalism and Ethnicity, Russian ideology, and opposition to the claimed universalism and emerging totalitarianism of Liberalism:
look at the /leftypol/ tranny copy and pasting his dump spam from the shithole he crawled out of
>YASS, THIS IS MY OPPORTUNITY, NOW THE POL CHUDS WILL LISTEN TO MY COMMIE RAMBLINGS -thought the /leftypol/ tranny
Anthony Sullivan
>>He's a nobody! He has no influence! He's a fringe lunatic! Nobody in Russia knows his name! He's only known in the West!
This, he is just another thinker among the hundreds out there critical of liberalism, I'm pretty sure Putin is well versed (and was before Dugin) in a subject as basic as liberalism, still sucks what happened to his daughter.
Jaxon Jackson
how about you quit being a faggot and give us a TL;DR no one is reading that shit
Adrian Gutierrez
Just read the first 2 posts for a QRD on his influence or lack thereof. The rest is just on him in general
>how about you quit being a faggot and give us a TL;DR no one is reading that shit he is a communist, he is physically incapable of making anything short or concise
"if you cannot explain something clearly with your own words, then it is proof you do not understand it" and that's how all commies work, they just repeat shit they heard without understanding any of it, due to extremely low IQ
Matthew Gray
bro, the first 2 posts is around 500 words. Just because you have Any Forums/Twitter-induced ADHD doesn't mean its actually long.
Finally somebody posting something good, too bad this thread will be drowned by spam and ADHD wectern retards wont give it a second thought
Ethan Stewart
>of which, Liberalism was the victorious one was it? sounds more like written by a us kid not knowing nothing what liberalism is and mistaken a system more like actively lived fascism like the states with actual liberalsim how the states and their leading theorists and scholars like to flavor and describe themself just to render the term meaningless by doing so and get completely confused worldwide when there is pushback you bringing milk and honey. holy fuck you are such massive faggot it almost hurts reading your pasta
David James
So does he call out who is controlling globohomo for real or not? Even the fucking Chinese are calling out the kikes.
Caleb Cox
I watched a interview where Putin was asked about him and his answer was basically “who?”
Jacob Murphy
>"if you cannot explain something clearly with your own words, then it is proof you do not understand it" Why do you think that?
Russia and China is currently (last 40 years) swept over by the politics of rivisionism. This is well understood by leninist thought. But on the grand scheme of things, they have no other choice but to move towards communism or face extinction. There are only two systems for a modern society (capitalism vs communism), and only one system under which asian and Eurasian people can survive.
He is either inbred degenerate or foreign intelligence asset. "Eurasianism" shit was spread in Russia by some freemason buttboys, apparently connected to anglo intelligence, as early as 19th century. Obviously irrelevant for USSR period, but looks like someone decided to start it again. In any case, "influence" he has is a western media meme, however it's still a shame he didn't get clapped and keeps embarrassing Russia with his faggot buffonade.
