• generally being shit Research shows that women are better leaders, including during crises (which is what the world is made of right now, because we've fucked up so much about it, on purpose, with full understanding of what we're doing). But I'm a man... and let's say I want men to look better... how can I attack women without regard for this apparent evidence which indicates women are better qualified to lead?
>This is why men in power can get away with: No They're usually not stupid enough to run around making videos at coke parties and posting it to their (insert thot social media here)
Alexander Watson
> Sample size is 3. > Written by Kikes. > OP is a kike.
This is because a woman needs to be a good leader to be taken seriously as a leader. Therefore, the women that became leaders before used to be good at leading. It's one of those "no duh" points once you think what the data actually says.
Isaiah Harris
no its just jewish pilpul no western leaders are good leaders. they are corrupt oligarchs who destroy their peoples lives for the benefit of their oligarch friends
>this apparent evidence which indicates women are better qualified to lead? What evidence?
Adrian Green
Yes. Methodology is equally important as sample size. It's not valid and legit science unless there are actual experiments involved. Remember, Michelle Obama told us that studies proved that the 2020 riots were mostly peaceful.
Liam Ward
Women should be slapped daily for being women.
Eli Smith
To be fair to the kike, Michael Obama is a dude, so you know.. lol
