Why aren't NATO bringing the Russians to heel?

People are severely underestimating how military inefficient the mutts are
Speaking of the 99 war, they bombed the Yugo army for 40 days and nights in a row with jets, rockets, missiles and whatnot, in an area as small as Kosovo
Final results were less than 50 destroyed tanks, a few dozen apcs and guns. Nato had to bomb Yugo cities because the army in Kosovo still wouldn't budge.
Lmao

Interracial cuckoldry is the price of freedom. Yuropoors wouldn’t understand.

But muh nukes have probably rusted away over time due to the lack of maintenance and corruption, right?

Why are you Slavs so prone to genocide? Why did you do My Lai?

>In 1978 director Michael Cimino broke new ground. He made the first serious, artistically ambitious, Hollywood movie to depict combat in Vietnam, The Deer Hunter (Kutler 61-74). In this historic film America’s involvement in Vietnam is understood not as the fruit of the machinations of wealthy and powerful Americans. It is not understood as the creation of men with names like “Kennedy,” “Johnson,” and “McNamara” who are divorced from the concerns of the blue-collar ethnics and other disproportionately poor and marginalized Americans and Third World peasants whose lives they destroy. Rather, the Vietnam War is depicted as the logical outcome of Bohunk culture. In this, The Deer Hunter gave artistic expression to a scholarly and popular press process that became noticeable in the sixties and seventies. Academic, press, and cultural elites came, inaccurately, to pin the social ills of racism and chauvinism on the stereotypically brutal and dumb blue-collar ethnic (Radzialowski 1976, 5; Novak 1975, 74; Hill 1975; Nie, et. al.1974; Hamilton 1972). It is ironic that imaginary Bohunks like Stanley Kowalski, so feared for the hunger that powerlessness brings, were now blamed for abuses of power that they never had.

Attached: 8F272785-09C1-4FE3-BF9A-0CFCB0D4E5BC.jpg (2170x3200, 1.25M)

Honestly I hope it finally happens at some point. Setting off the nukes would send us back to the stone age, but we'd survive as a species and eventually recover. But we'd never be able to re-industrialize, too much would be destroyed. WWIII would be a permanent reset to a non-degen natural way of life. And what if I die? Not like I'm doing anything of consequence with my life.

>Why are you Slavs so prone to genocide?
Could it get any more ironic?

If you know you know

If the Russians have anything, it's working nukes. You're like a big North Korea, kind of a joke but also serious because you have nukes and you believe your own bullshit. Without the nukes you wouldn't exist.

Muh wonderwaffen f-35 will sneak past radar and destroy them like a hecking ace combat mission if they take off

They don't even need F-35 when they have Maverick

They caused pic related with loosing only a couple of jets. And they did it with precision strikes. I dread to think what would happen if they started indiscriminately bombing us Dresden style. I'm not a US simp but realistically it's a David vs Goliath battle but Goliath is in an M1 Abrams with JDAM fire support.
You only need a couple of functioning nukes to stave of the US, that's why North Korea is still a thing. It's not hard to maintain them. And Russia is also building new nukes.

Attached: nato-bombingof-serbia.png (308x383, 42.52K)

Why bomb Russia when you can bomb Serbroaches all over again?

I'm really hoping shit pops off in the Balkans. Russians won't do nothing about it besides seethe.

Serbs will cry about imaginary Turks while Putin literally divorced his Russian Slavic wife for a Turk (Volga Tatar) mistress. Serbs are basically mutts descended from Avars, Bulgars and Huns but have shaped their whole identity around fighting imaginary Turks whom they descend from.

Kosovo only declared independence in 2008 after Montenegro did it in 2006, and that was supposed to be Serbia's closest ally. Serbs are still obsessed with landlocked Kosovo that's nothing more than a patch of dirt when you could be fixing your own country. Vatniks and Chetniks are such hypocritical cringelords.

Attached: -785-0-5d5aba0176330.jpg (785x840, 141.97K)

At the end of the day we all have enough nukes to finish everyone off. Nobody wins. But as far as an all out conflict goes with no nukes, Russia would get absolutely embarrassed by NATO.

>Why aren't NATO bringing the Russians to heel?
Why do anything, if Russia is doing all the heavy lifting for us?

Fuck that gopnik scum, let them rot in their vast, uninhabitable shithole.

What's Russia done for (You) exactly? Destroy your automotive industry?

watch source pls

Attached: 1657273305980.jpg (5120x3414, 1.9M)

>watch source pls
hm?