The British decided to give a public signal to the Office of the President that "we need to continue", to pump the case of the NPP.
"Any deliberate damage to the Ukrainian nuclear reactor with a possible radiation leak would be a violation of NATO Article 5," he wrote.
Ukraine began to disperse it with a hint that here it is a chance to tighten NATO. You just have to sacrifice an energy gift and so on.
In fact, no one will fight for Ukraine. Especially NATO. Even if the Russian Federation bangs a nuclear bomb on Kiev. In this case, they can only ban everyone from trading with Russia, try to make North Korea out of it, and then it won't work, the Russian Federation is too huge a country where everything is, and the capitalists are too greedy for money and will come up with schemes to circumvent their own sanctions.
That's what an explosion can give to Ukraine and Western curators. 1. Ukraine will be able to knock out another couple of billion in financial aid. Yes, money is very important to them, otherwise the whole house of cards will collapse. So the curators are forcing Zelensky to raise the stakes. 2. The President's office will get even more weapons. Perhaps aircraft and air defense 3. The case of the Russian Federation-the terrorist country will be pumped even more 4. Russia will get polluted territories on which it will be necessary to spend a lot of money 5. Russia will lose a large nuclear power plant (its cost is more than $ 30 billion). 6. This will pollute the water that goes to the Crimea, which will complicate life on the peninsula. It will cease to be a tourist or anything at all. 7. The Western lobby will increase military contracts. Pharmaceutical lobbies will get their profits, politicians will get a long anti-Russian informational occasion.
Ukraine knows that they are not able to recapture the territories of Energodar, Kherson, Melitopol, which means it is necessary to make them deserted.
>"Any deliberate damage to the Ukrainian nuclear reactor with a possible radiation leak would be a violation of NATO Article 5," he wrote. kind of like the thing with the Japanese reactor nobody wants to clean
Joseph Thompson
>Any deliberate damage to the Ukrainian nuclear reactor with a possible radiation leak would be a violation of NATO Article 5 I can't believe NATO is threatening Ukraine.
nato will never do shit cause they are literal scam org made to steal tax money and solve 0 problems
Jordan Perez
Russians are a bioweapon, the most destructive race on earth, just look how they treated each other under tsars and commies. They literally inform on each other to the government for no benefit, just to create misery
Ryder Hill
things have actually have been happening since the dawn of time
Hunter Stewart
>Be Ukrainian >Put weapons in kindergarten >Russians blow it up >How could this happen? This is warcrime
John Cook
Did you caught syphilis of a brain from you whore PM?
Nolan Bailey
Nothing will happen as per usual Both Nato and Russia will pussy out /chug/ will go back to coping and seething /uhg/ will go back to dilating
Luke Howard
>empty kindergarten >vs >working nuclear plant stop leeching on swedecuck welfare, ivan
Jayden Diaz
Ah, yes, that damn Russia using NATO ammo to shell power plant they hold.
Josiah Wright
Lmao weren’t the hohols using that very plant to store weapons before they lost it?
I recall a bunch of pictures of gear from inside it posted just after it fell. I guess Ukrainians are even bigger retards than anyone could have predicted if they actually blow the place and permanently irradiate their own country rather than accepting a peace deal at the start where the only loss would be the donbass.
Luis Sullivan
>i recall >source: fsb telegram back to russia, vatnik
Noah Williams
If you're not paid then my condolences.
Ayden Long
Just nuke London and get it over with. You'd be doing us a favour.
Colton Fisher
what day is it on your 3 day war fuck face ?
Aaron Hernandez
>muh 3 days Dont you ever get tired of repeating this ridiculous shit?
