>James Webb Space Telescope hit by tiny meteoroid
>since 1 month no new photos
its over.
James Webb Space Telescope hit by tiny meteoroid
Luke Murphy
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Justin Flores
>it never existed to begin with
>nasa is a money laundering business
>space is fake
Brody Hall
aliens sent it to stop us from finding them.
Christian Flores
This!
Connor White
It was an inside job by based North Koreans and a sturn warning to ask Kim Jung Un for permission next time before putting your hot garbage in orbit.
Aaron Cook
>No new photos
You're not paying attention or you're intentionally lying for (You)s
James Thompson
this, and normies are believing in sausages in the sky
Joseph Rodriguez
They're fake, dumbass, trying to cover up that Houston has a problem.
Leo Perez
You're deluded or have realized that you're wrong and doubling down on the lying
Leo Robinson
One thing I don't understand is:
> our planets are not sucked into the sun, because they are at a orbiting sweetspot where their orbit velocity matches the gravitational velocity of the sun, so they technically falling "arround the sun"
> if they slow down, they would get pulled into the sun
> just like everythig does.
> but not the james web telescope
> which is only traveling with ~1000km/h > earth travels with ~60,000km/h aound the sun
> JWT is 1.5million km closer to the sun than the earth is to the sun
How is it possible for JWT to not get sucked into the sun?
Jeremiah Scott
>How is it possible for JWT to not get sucked into the sun?
It's positioned at the second lagrange point.
"Normally, the two massive bodies exert an unbalanced gravitational force at a point, altering the orbit of whatever is at that point. At the Lagrange points, the gravitational forces of the two large bodies and the centrifugal force balance each other.[2] This can make Lagrange points an excellent location for satellites, as few orbit corrections are needed to maintain the desired orbit. Small objects placed in orbit at Lagrange points are in equilibrium in at least two directions relative to the center of mass of the large bodies."
Kevin Morgan
But the Lagrange points are only close to earth or on eaths orbit.
Also this sounds really ridiculous.
Because they were supposed discovered (in theory) in 1700s.
And only possible on a perfect circular orbit. Which we do not have, according to NASA.
This sounds like a made up lie to cover up another lie.
To money launder 10 billion dollars in tax money.
Caleb Gray
There is a firmament preventing us from going to space.
Aiden Foster
you think maybe it was hacked during deployment and "stolen" and used to spy on people or countries or whatever?
Dominic Clark
you think maybe the "Hubble picture"/"coastline" comparison thing was a sort of admission of this?
Matthew Peterson
I wonder if they used the "NSAKEY" to steal it....
Isaac Ross
Just remember, you're a retarded Any Forums fag trying to armchair analyze a multi billion dollar project employing experts in just about every relevant field
Remember that when trying to poke holes in something you fundamentally know nothing about.
Lucas Robinson
L3-L5 NON EXISTS, THERE IS ANOTER PLANETS
Noah Rodriguez
Stop blaming us, we're not the meteoroid that fucked your telescope.
Camden Jackson
Well they shitcanned that hoax faster than I thought they would. 10 billion dollars well spent.
Jackson Russell
NASAbros, we can’t help jewing up the goyim a big time!
Nicholas Lee
>trying to poke holes in something
oh you.jpg