Why hasn't Russia won in Ukraine yet?
I was one of the people saying Ukraine shpuld've surrendered and that Zelensky was a grifter trying to get as much money into his pockets as possible before giving up, but Russia has retreated and stalled for so long that I'm honestly shocked.
I get that they can't nuke them but they are acting so timid that I really don't understand what Putin is thinking.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.org
twitter.com
Russia is paper bear
>fail to win against uneducated mountain goat herders in sandals with no allies for 20 years
>expecting Russia to win against a white country with industry and education in europe that has full backing of NATO within 6 months
Come on now son, grow the fuck up. You know winning (or losing) takes time. Russia took city of Marinka and two more towns within the last 24 hours. What the hell did you do in that time aside from complaining?
bud you know how nato armies are fucking shit well russia isn't doing much better ww3 is going to be a slap fight between retards
>Russia took city of Marinka
For the 15th time? I mean, Russia celebrates taking that city more times than they celebrated taking Pisky and Siversk
>Why hasn't Russia won in Ukraine yet?
they were even unable to help Syria to rid itself of foreign powers
putin wanted to install puppet state but failed, russia wouldnt survive annexation of whole ukraine, we dont have so many government workers to maintain all of ukraine, therefore russia need to swallow already liberated regions first and in few years start to push further
They all speak fluent Russian except for the very Western part of the country
>Why hasn't Russia won in Ukraine yet?
They are not in a rush. They don't have a population and media that thinks that unless they succeed in X amount of time, it's pointless to continue the war effort.
This was the reason thet sillylittlebush decleared 'Misson Accomplished' when it was no where near finished. To placate home media and people who were wary of the war already.
Americans don't seem to understand that the way eastern europeans and westerners think is way different.
Yes, you can show piles of pictures or russian mothers, wives and relatives of soldiers crying at their son/husband/brother's coffin....I'm sure this happens everywhere.
But you also automatically think that just cz the son/husband/brother died, the family will automatically turn on the leadership.
This is the key difference. In Russia the family accepts that if the son/husband/brother goes to war, then there is a chance that he is going to get killed. This doesn't seem to be the case in America and the west. There people think war is something like a video game, where you just pummel the enemy from the air until they give up.
Well, I'm sure you have heard about how western mercs ran with their tail between their legs from Ukraine after they realized that this was NOTHING like the 'wars' they fought in Iraq or Afghanistan.
>picrel
I would say that the orange parts have minimum of 80% russian speakers
Winning is not a part of Putin's cuck warfare doctrine.
>Why hasn't Russia won in Ukraine yet?
The West is actieveley driving itself into the ground despite Russia's inaction.
This is like reverse late Soviet Union crisis.
Because they are dogshit fighters. When was the last time they won a war fighting alone without allies?
This is why, Enjoy!
>archive.org
>When was the last time they won a war fighting alone without allies?
fighting against natives who didn't have access to gunpowder
Who knows, there are levels to these things. I find it hard to believe Russia is taking more causalities though.
Russian speakers =/= Russians.
Zelensky is one of Russian speakers as well as the majority of Ukrainian soldiers who fight Russians.
This war has never been because of the language.
Russia needs overwhelming numbers to win battles, this has been true for all of history.
Limiting the war to a special operation was Putin's greatest mistake because he couldn't hit the mobilize button and can't do it now that the war has devolved into trench warfare because that would be an admittance of the fact that the glorious Russian army was beaten by a country that was expected to collapse in a week.
Ukraine exist only due to foreign aid. Russia has won. Ukraine had a shit economy before the war and now has no economy. Ukraine is only life support and that is before Russia has flattened the major Ukrainian cities
Russia would lose to Texas police force in 1v1 combat
Bullshit graph.
Ukrainians all speak russian just as their parents and grandparents did.
might be that the usa is spending a billion per day propping up zelensky's government
Pootin is a hidden agent globohomo
They'll take 2 or 3 oblasts and the rest of the country will instantly join NATO which is what Russia wanted to prevent in the first place. Even just having a neutral buffer state of Ukraine would be a win for the west.
The goal for Russia is not to 'win' but to get concessions out of Europe before the winter starts. They are in no hurry.
European governments on the other hand serve Moloch in Washington, and Moloch thinks it's funny to torture white Europeans and to destroy what's left of the constitutional order in Europe
>Implying that monke and his republic will last that long