When did people start seeing Muslims as violent and backwards? Did 9/11 trigger this...

When did people start seeing Muslims as violent and backwards? Did 9/11 trigger this, or was this sentiment common before then?

Attached: 1988_Salman_Rushdie_The_Satanic_Verses.jpg (256x394, 53K)

About the same time they saw Christians that way

Anyways Tim Osman is retired on a ranch in Virginia and all the opium has been sold to overweight white people in Florida so who cares anymore

Because even before 9/11 they were bombing shit (for example the Lockerbie bombing) and even more so after. Anybody who hears "Allahu Ackbar" ducks for cover.

crusades timeframe?
sacking of andalusian peninsula maybe?
umayyad or abassid conquests perhaps?

Muslims were always violent. The first non-Muslim records of Muhammad are of his armies genociding non-Muslims.
They weren't however always backward; they were actually near the height of human civilization from the 8th century-14th century or so. It seems that the Turkic and Mongol invasions along with the importation of black slaves, inbreeding, and the change in educational and philosophical norms seemed to retard their civilization.

Probably at least since the 1972 Olympics when that Palestinian grouped kidnapped and killed those Jews

Andalusia and Umayyad to the Abbasid empires were very highly developed. They were hardly backward.

Lol 9 11 is nothing
Muzzies are demon spawn right from times of momad

Those were communists, they weren't even Muslim.

Since the 11th century

The first records of muhammad by non-Muslims. All they mention is genocide

>many villages were ruined with killing by [the Arabs of] Mụhammad and a great number of people were killed and captives [were taken] from Galilee as far as Bēth [...] and those Arabs pitched camp beside [Damascus?] [...] and we saw everywhe[re...] and o[l]ive oil which they brought and them. And on the t[wenty six]th of May went S[ac[ella]rius]... cattle [...] [...] from the vicinity of Emesa and the Romans chased them [...] and on the tenth [of August] the Romans fled from the vicinity of Damascus [...] many [people] some 10,000. And at the turn [of the ye]ar the Romans came; and on the twentieth of August in the year n[ine hundred and forty-]seven there gathered in Gabitha [...] the Romans and great many people were ki[lled of] [the R]omans, [s]ome fifty thousand [...][48]

>there was a battle between the Romans and the Arabs of Mụhammad [Syr. tayyāyē d-Ṃhmt] in Palestine twelve miles east of Gaza. The Romans fled, leaving behind the patrician YRDN (Syr. BRYRDN), whom the Arabs killed. Some 4000 poor villagers of Palestine were killed there, Christians, Jews and Samaritans. The Arabs ravaged the whole region. AG 947, indiction IX: The Arabs invaded the whole of Syria and went down to Persia and conquered it; the Arabs climbed mountain of Mardin and killed many monks there in [the monasteries of] Kedar and Benōthō. There died the blessed man Simon, doorkeeper of Qedar, brother of Thomas the priest.[51]

these are form the 7th century

After isreal was created

>They weren't however always backward; they were actually near the height of human civilization from the 8th century-14th century or so
Of course they were backwards. it's just that the rest of the world was in a dark age, dipshit.
Your argument is like saying the dark grey in the corner of a picture isn't really dark because the rest of the picture is black.
It takes effort to be as stupid as that. You sure you're not a muslim?

Muslims have always been aggressive and murderous, constantly seeking to expand.

Being violent is being progressive.

>Lol 9 11 is nothing
>Muzzies are demon spawn right from times of momad
Pajeets are literally browner jews.

>Kafirs lie about Islam and Muhammad
What's new?

Attached: Pajeet lies and deception.png (1920x1080, 1.57M)

>Muslims have always been aggressive and murderous, constantly seeking to expand.
Expanding doesn't imply being murderous or aggressive. That is only the case with christkikes and their violent history.

Attached: Arab conquest.jpg (800x1022, 155.84K)

Yea but tbf most of them are violent

About the time Islam was created.
When Muhammad won his struggle against the Meccans and was able to return to Mecca, his first act was kill a female poet who had been making fun of him.
Killing became a foundation of Islam.

>Yea but tbf most of them are violent
More Pajeet projection.

Attached: Hindutva 2.png (748x675, 561.4K)

You gonna deny muslims from middle being violent?

>. it's just that the rest of the world was in a dark age
And the Muslims at the same time were in a Golden Age, hence they were at the height of humanity for a number of centuries. As a civilization they produced hundreds of great minds so even in comparison to the Romans or Greeks they were well accomplished. Europe didn't truly surpass them until the 14th century.
>You sure you're not a muslim?
Islam is a kike religion, and I don't follow kike religions. Still facts are facts and the Islamic Golden Age can't be denied. What should be studied is why it ended.
where is the lie? These are personal notes found centuries after the fact. Islam was always genocidal. Even in the Quaran itself it is said villages of jews were wiped out. (Good job btw)