Art is finally dead! All artfags will be forced to get a job now!

Art is finally dead! All artfags will be forced to get a job now!

AI FOR THE PEOPLE!

youtu.be/1__9fz54WPY

Attached: Screenshot_20220819-200422_1.jpg (720x540, 76.65K)

I still remember AI dungeon doing the same shit but with books and stories. Shame what happened with the mormons

I find it incredibly ironic that everyone thought it would be jobs like cashier and delivery/truck driver that would be replaced first but AI started in the most hilarious place which one would assume is the most “human”. Concept Art.

Actually I predicted this in 2000, but everybody laughed at me.

wait until people make it generate hentai

Sucks man

Realistic 3d porn using uploaded images.

What if we are the AI?

People predict you’ll be able to generate photorealistic pornography scenarios in less then 5 years. The moral implications of this will be immense.

Attached: f75509fa-2d4f-4f3c-9157-9e9331266b3c_screenshot.jpg (656x480, 20.83K)

Oh good. I can finally make the comic I always wanted.

lol

we still laughing at you nigger

>5:04
LMAO

Barely even 4 or 5 years ago people were saying this shit was a pipe dream that wouldn't be done in our lifetimes, primarily because of ignorance of how modern machine learning works, now artists and writers are shitting themselves. Things are going to get very scary very quick. Andrew Yang was unironically right, UBI now.

The impact of this on art is historically as big as photography had been.

If this shit is generated by the AI taking samples of art wouldnt people still need to make art for the AI to look at?

Perhaps everybody laughs at your kippah...

It's not like people used to appreciate art in the past or that actually good art exists these days. Most modern music is absolutely terrible and it doesn't matter if the music of the future will be done by humans or machines, it's still going to be shit.
t. artfag

basically there's "enough" data online for it to generate just about anything

>non artistic people declaring art is dead just because ai can do some kinds of art
You should be smarter than this, but you're evidently not. It can only mimic and reproduce and combine what has already been made, borrowing from it, but can it truly create art? Nein.

>Andrew Yang was unironically right, UBI now.
Or, get a real job, bum.

I don't really care about the "artists" (newsflash: if your generic "art" can be replaced by some random computer algorithm you aren't an artist).
The real problem lies in content generation. Right now governments need literally thousands of shills and specialists creating content to propagate certain agendas, but in the future all of this will be automated (if it isn't already). From song writing, over composition to novels and movies: Everything which is generic in nature and extremely widespread will soon be generated by machines.

Attached: Screenshot_20220819-205633.jpg (720x1480, 375.05K)

we can print on canvas since 15/20 years
ppl still buy /order real paintings
ai still cant draw manga
still cant make music
pic related looks like poorly photoshoped photo
digital artists might go down
but painters are still going strong
(just make 10 oil paintings at the same time , manufactue it for normies and sell it for 700/2000 zl) stupid normies eat manual paintings even if you do stupid mistakes that wont matter for them

So it does the same fucking shit any "artist" does?

>UBI now.
No.
You didn't thought this through.
UBI = dependening on government for the rest of your life. Get ready to be vaccinated every 3 months and get cancelled if you wrongthink.

>reeeeee fuck you
>contextfail
No, it doesn't. Retard. Maybe if all artists only had as much brain power as you I guess.

To all of you faggotnigger nufags and newfags here who believe you're in good shared company being retards who just rejoice in your own failings and lack of ability somehow being validated by ai doing something people can do you are jealous of because you can't?
Quit behaving like fucking kikes. Right this fucking instant.

iconography is still a huge business, and the more traditional the product the higher the price. I have heard that iconography is even popular in poland, is this true?

Attached: 0E8386A1-CB46-464C-9ED6-D2E246E78D56.jpg (750x876, 497.49K)

it kida can make some generic stuff / landscapes on its own but it cant make pic related ,
and probably will never be able to (especialy mangas and comics)
other example - it will never make master tier color based/focus painings (digital too) because ai do not understand colours the same human brain do and top tier artists understand that subconsciously (they play with human perceptions)

Attached: 10.jpg (1280x1815, 709.32K)

Once the old boomer ficks die off, nobody will buy this scam shit anymore.

AND IT'S BEATIFUL
I REALLY LIKE A.I AND KIND OF SICK AND TIRED OF HUMANS PRETENDING TO BE DEEP AND ARTISTIC

YOU TIME IS DONE PRIMITIVE BRAIN HUMAN SCUM, TIME TO EMBRACE THE MERGE OF HUMAN DNA AND THE MACHINE

but I see many young artists across eastern europe producing such art? even in western europe and here in america too.

Attached: 147FE2F1-564A-47A8-BF93-837F62E716C5.jpg (656x853, 410.4K)

Only old retarded fucks believing in jewish gods buy this.

yea , fun fact the one guy who i know that work on this on the side (main job border guard) use stuff like car paint/lacquer
i bet most of them do not use traditional tehniqes (tempera paint - egg based is fucking nightmare and easy to damage by touching it)
its very popular but its NOT iconography , its looks like it , religous old folks love it
but its not "replikas" as they are very hard to do with original methods and normies cant see the difference

Your brain is electrical, every thought you think happens because a series of neurons fire like circuit.

We were ALWAYS the AI. Instinct is programming. Bodies are drones. The only thing that differentiates our drone bodies from those of animals is that we hold programming to allow us to go against our more basic animal programming that we have in common with them.