Seriously what the fuck is wrong with people
Wtf is clam slamming
get laid incel.
PROVERBS 31:10
Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.
EPHESIANS 5
22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
1 TIMOTHY 2
11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
1 CORINTHIANS 11
7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1 PETER 3
1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
3 Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
4 But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.
what kind of people would promote a culture to maximize profits at expense of all else
Beep boop
Why would a loving god make an entire gender whose purpose is to suffer in subjugation?
If you read the Bible it clearly states God created Man first and Woman to keep him company.
So men are suddenly people now how many years did it take fifteen?
How does that answer the question?
The question was, "Why would a loving god make an entire gender whose purpose is to suffer in subjugation?"
The answer is, "To keep men company."
The problem here is you assume that there must be something wrong with it and muh freedom and post modern values and subjective interpretations.
God says Woman make babies and submit to their husbands to do the big thinking. Why? I dunno God does a lot of things.
They suffer because they aren’t subjugated.
>Wtf is clam slamming
The female version of teabagging.
>The answer is, "To keep men company."
That's a retarded answer.
>Why? I dunno
lmao
They chimp out over their rights, so it obviously isn't a fun time for a lot of them.
>Why would a loving god make an entire gender whose purpose is to suffer in subjugation?
That's the entire human race you idiot.
>They chimp out over their rights,
Which they can't even define without using fallacies.
>That's a retarded answer.
Actually it's not, it's God answer. The only reason you care about Woman's rights is because marketers told you to.
>it's God answer.
Then it's a retarded answer from "God".
>lmao
You think this is a stupid answer because you actually haven't thought out the implications of what you are saying.
If you are implying there isn't a God, you are saying that Humans evolved by the mechanism of evolution, which implies that evolutionary all the traits that make women submissive to men are in fact beneficial to the species.
If you are saying God isn't loving, you are denying God and saying his ultimate wisdom is inferior to yours.
defying*
So you're just going to keep saying the R word or do you know other ones too?
Why can't men keep each other company? Like not in a gay way, but the whole "philosophy/war/glory" shit is infinitely more entertaining than shopping.
>If you are implying there isn't a God, you are saying that Humans evolved by the mechanism of evolution, which implies that evolutionary all the traits that make women submissive to men are in fact beneficial to the species.
You know there's "Dysgenics" too. Even God won't go straight to salt pillars in most cases.
I don't know a greater retard than the one who thinks they speak for an omnipotence.
I guess option B is other religions but most of them are based too.
Very well said, you win the argument very redpilling
faggot
> than the one who thinks they speak for an omnipotence.
Your first post is you stating exactly what you think an omnipotent being should think if it's real.