...just nuked his whole career. He claimed he doesn't care about the media burying the Hunter Biden story, even approving of it if it meant getting rid of Trump. He actually said he wouldn't care if Hunter a "basement of dead babies" and that taking bribes from China and corrupt governments was better than....Trump University. That was his rationale. It's so bad, Twitter is now trending his "clarification". What a shitstain.
I don't want to hear anymore bullshit about jewish "intelligence" ever again. It's clear they are not more intelligent than anyone else and only a midwit sycophant or fellow moron would claim otherwise at this point. I never knew much about him outside a few soundbites, but I had always assumed he was somewhat reasonable because he occasionally pissed off the right people. He doesn't even get that now.
Sam Harris
I can't believe Sam went full
>BUT WE'RE THE GOOD GUYS
mode
Holy shit how badly has his mind been warped?
What will you do without this boring jew?
Live as I have always lived, secure in the knowledge that no matter how bad things get, at least I am not Sam Harris.
Undeserved arrogance will do that you kek
Perhaps he just misread the venue or the extent to which his words would proliferate, but either way, he's toast.
Liberals are all scum at this point
What you anons completely fail to understand is that it's ok when we do it
"his mother is Jewish"
Sam is probably the dumbest one of the 'Intellectual Dark Web' --- yes, dumber than Rogan. They all know it.
What if he's being used to expose the public to that truth?
Well, why don't you just cry about it then, Trumpnigger?
Do millions of people actually watch this guy's videos or are they just bots/inflated?
There is always that chance, but not because it's a feasible scenario, only that we can't rule it out completely. However, given his history of anti-Trump comments, there is nothing to insinuate that he was being anything except honest. If not honest, then he was simply playing to the audience's biases, which means he's still a piece of shit.
You really are bad at trolling.
It could be bots, but he does sell a lot of books, so he must have some amount of following.
When will you learn to stop trusting jews?
How many fucking decades will it take?
How often do they need to betray you?
Nimrod, do you understand what a non-sequitur is?
His career will be fine. He was never what was portrayed, the new atheists pushed against an open door, their stances were not brave or thoughtful, just as today, they engaged in rigged debates with strawman grade banana hand men and gate kept their image as the original reddit intellectuals. The "trust the experts" class were easily over awed by people who sounded the part, in Sam's case his trick was radio voice, NPR cuts all the pauses and stutters ums and ahs to give the impression of perfect delivery, Sam does this in real time, his one talent is to give an impression of being a thoughtful man through uninterrupted speech.
Should have been clear after his attempt to promote his new atheist morality of rewarmed utilitarianism that there was nothing there, but he served a purpose for the regime of leading people down the path of atheism and degeneracy, asking only the questions they allowed, and so he was not just humored but heavily promoted as public intellectual.
All the major new atheists either became full on mask off libtards in the end. Wasn't about reason, it was purely about being anti Christian.
Sam Harris approves of misinformation.
I don't agree but preserving democracy is pretty important and Trump is incompatible with that so I get it
I was a giant Sam Harris fan until I saw how bad his TDS was. Also, his take on vaccines was pretty poor, too.
I guess you won't disagree with anybody 100%, but I really think he checks under his bed for Trump before he goes to sleep.
Sam Harris always struck me as self indulgent and arrogant in his vaunted intelligence. He's not that bright in the first place and he cannot update his opinions based on evidence or reason.
Just another victim of TDS. Sad. Many such cases.
How does rationalizing taking bribes from corrupt communist governments protect democracy? How does spiking a story to deliberately influence an election protect democracy? What rationale do you use to claim a democratically elected president is "incompatible" with democracy?
Those are rhetorical. I don't really want you to answer.
he's one of the biggest cases of TDS on the planet
>What rationale do you use to claim a democratically elected president is "incompatible" with democracy?
I assume nobody can be this stupid that you don't already know the answer to this after 2020. The heart of democracy is peaceful concession and transfer of power.
I agree with most of that, but not about his career. He may coast for awhile, but I think he's done building his brand. His whole base was usually young college aged men who felt something was wrong with the system, but couldn't quite put their finger on why they felt uneasy. He built his following within that crowd largely because he seemed to be somewhat of an outsider, willing to say what he thought. I don't think he's going to be given that same benefit of the doubt after this.
To who?
The heart of democracy is serving the will of the people, that hasn't happened for a century at least.
Notably, you ignored the questions and glossed over the entire point of the comment. And you seem to honestly think that pic holds some sort of relevance.
It's as if there isn't a sentient leftist on the planet? Are you all just soulless AI with bad programming?
I literally answered your last question you illiterate goon