LONG LIVE THE ARISTOCRACY

youtu.be/TpBkJ0Xb6ME?t=144

Attached: French-Revolution.jpg (970x545, 195.37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

jstor.org/stable/3622451
revolution.chnm.org/d/285
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The French Revolution was just kikes getting into power

fpbp

Russian revolution was just kikes getting into power

weren't all of them?

Yes.

Attached: Grant's_crocodile_tears.jpg (220x301, 28.4K)

Thanka for the link. I'm loving this movie.

It's fucking great. I don't know how to shill it. Please spread the word.

silence peasant

Odds fish, my dear fellow! Leafy's got superb taste.

Bump for the Scarlet Pimpernel

Attached: 15490336_so.jpg (696x1000, 167.32K)

Napoleon was great for France, but he was like Hitler in that while he wasn't traditional blood-related aristocracy, his aristocracy was more primeval and ancient rather than entrenched and orthodox.

The royals may have been angered at Napoleon, calling him an upstart general, but the thing is, he was doing what their ancestors had done. Plenty of kings in ancient and medieval times were great military leaders who harkened their kingdoms into grandeur, only to see their lazy, foppish descendants piss it away.

I will grant Louis that he refused to concede to a constitutional monarchy. The Jewish puppet Jacques Necker tried to get him to concede to this at the Estates General in 1789, and when he refused, the meeting quickly turned violent, as the Jews whipped the third and largest estate up into a frenzy with their control of the media, but the royals of the time really should have done something greater to fight the Jew than what they did.

They never conceived of the unified and multipolar threat against their nations, thinking that time could be as it always was, and when they called Napoleon and a century later Hitler upstarts, this was akin to a craftsman getting angry at any improvement of their works. Their indolence had proven catastrophic. Their rule was great but it was contested, and men of action were doing what was necessary.

The monarchs who saw clearly were either deposed or killed. See Nicholas II, August Wilhelm, or Edward VIII for examples.

>The Jewish puppet Jacques Necker tried to get him to concede to this at the Estates General in 1789, and when he refused, the meeting quickly turned violent, as the Jews whipped the third and largest estate up into a frenzy with their control of the media, but the royals of the time really should have done something greater to fight the Jew than what they did.
>They never conceived of the unified and multipolar threat against their nations,
This was way pre-vatican 2.
At that point in time the Catholic Church was teaching publicly against the Jews, wasn't it?

>time the Catholic Church was teaching publicly against the Jews
jstor.org/stable/3622451

Attached: Screen Shot 2022-08-18 at 6.11.42 PM.png (1114x1524, 792.47K)

>Abbot Jean-Sifrain Maury
Calling Jews citizens would be like saying that without letters of naturalization and without ceasing to be English and Danish, the English and Danish could become French. . . .

The Jews have passed through seventeen centuries without involving themselves with other nations. They have never undertaken anything other than commerce based on money; they have been the scourge of agricultural provinces; not one of them has yet known how to ennoble his hands by driving a plow. The law that they follow leaves them no time to engage in agriculture; in addition to the sabbath they have fifty-six more festivals each year than the Christians. In Poland, they have a large province. And so! The sweat of Christian slaves waters the furrows in which the opulence of the Jews germinates, and they, while their fields are thus cultivated, weigh the ducats [money] and calculate what they can remove from the currency without exposing themselves to legal penalties. . . .

In Alsace they hold 12 million mortgages on the land. In a month, they would become owners of half of this province; in ten years, they would have entirely conquered it, and it would be nothing but a Jewish colony. People feel for the Jews a hatred that cannot fail to explode as a result of this aggrandizement. For their own safety, we should table this matter."
revolution.chnm.org/d/285

Attached: Jean-Sifrain Maury.png (1200x554, 415.64K)

>People feel for the Jews a hatred that cannot fail to explode as a result of this aggrandizement. For their own safety, we should table this matter."
So a Catholic in the 1700's could predict that assimilating Jews in France would result in an explosive danger to the Jews, because of how they behave.
More foresight than Nostradamus.

Yes. Figured it out while posting. It's true.

Finished watching it. Not bad. He keeps repeating sink mehhh so much it gets stupidily hilarious.

Checked. Yeah the point is he has to larp as a "fop"/metrosexual faggot so his anti-revolutionary alter ego won't be detected.
Like acting like an NPC around libs to spy on them and lurk among them undetected.

fpbp counterrevolution when?

>the Catholic Church was teaching publicly against the Jews, wasn't it?
from since it's inception up to recently, and from the next Pope onwards

>More foresight than Nostradamus
he was a jew himself

Exactly.

Based and tradpilled.

FPBP

It would involve Terreur-like amounts of slaughtering.

Name one.

>Terreur-like amounts of slaughtering.
may I join?

Attached: 1659187467692157.jpg (451x485, 103.82K)

;^)

Attached: Dirleboys.jpg (3840x2160, 724.34K)

Lots of Any Forumsacks (both original and new) praise aristocracy and have blanket praise for all aristocrats of history. I don't see why I should simp for any of them unless they used their wealth and influence to benefit their race and openly (not secretly) called out the jew and drove him from our lands.

You people, you aristocrat fans, tell me that aristocrats are good for us and protect us like a father protects his children. But a wealthy father would speak up for his children and use his wealth to improve their lives and protect them. And he would certainly not take loans from invaders who wanted to enslave and murder his own children.
No, I have no sympathy for them. If they will not do their duty to advance White interests, I will not simp for them. Let them all drown in lakes of blood. That is what they deserve for collaborating with the jews in our humiliation and destruction.

>to advance White interests
there was no need to do so as whites weren't being invaded at the time

> whites weren't being invaded at the time
Oh yeah? Then what were the jews doing in Europe?

living in guettos ever since Hadrian kicked them out of their homeland