Anyone who uses the n-word is ontologically evil

>and live in all-white countries
What's wrong with that, why are whites the only people not allowed to do this ?

seeing red at two syllables doesn't make you woke. it makes you an easily-manipulated pawn.

Attached: E923F9E8-89A9-4027-8ED9-8F30ABAA47A5.jpg (671x665, 61.53K)

Also never mix with niggers, they have the worst set of genes and pass animalistic subhuman traits to babies.
White genes are superior to every other group except Semitic genes.

>you just want to destroy other races
No, they have their own countries.
>And live in all-white countries
Yes. And?

Will you fuck off? I'll keep saying it until jews can't say goyim.

Yes, yes I do. But you fuckers won't leave us alone and let us live like that. You want your multi cultural faggot paradise? Okay, by all means, go for it. But if my country doesn't want anything but whites then we should have that right too.

I do want to live in an all white country but unfortunately I don't.

Fuck niggers and fuck the communist gangster computer god.
youtube.com/watch?v=bJh2OGmZQ1Q

how about this people who use the n word and people who care about people using it are equally lame.

anyone who restricts my speech is ontologically evil.

Does that apply to niggers who say nigger all the time?

You just called yourself lame.

Niggercommie

What goals in society are you attempting to accomplish by leveraging communism? Ie: equality of earnings? Fairness? Social stability? Climate policy?

What metrics are you using? Unless you define them the "debates" on this board will go nowhere because there is too much variability within the current definitions.

I am former communist turned an unironic national socialist. I believe that this system will produce the best outcomes for countering imperialism, ethnic oppression, and globalist materialist and religious subversion. In the same vein also believe that it is the best system for promoting ethnic agency and responsibility as well as the best solution to the underclass problem when it comes to social stability. I view communism and capitalism as two sides of the same Hebrew coin of globalist dialetic materialism. This terms is used as an umbrella for both systems because they both measure the health of societies and humanity by pure material metrics. The capitalists view unrestricted growth measure by GDP and similar metrics as the absolute pinnacle of human capacity to measure social health and pursue the rise of GDP like metrics above all else, sacrificing the actual social health in the process. Similarly, communism views absolute material equality as the highest metric of social health, sacrificing anything and everything including social health in that pursuit.

In opposition to this dialetic, nationalism posits an antithesis. Localism, ethnically based, uses ethnically derived narratives as the drivers of the metrics of social health. In other words, nationalism as a post modern philosophy proposes that it is the responsibility of each ethnic peoples to establish their own "binding stories" (religio) on which to base their measurements of social well being. Under this model, material metrics are sacrificed as needed to the ethno-narrative metrics and done so with clear agency and responsibility for the success or failure of that metric.

Nationalism, especially in the current technological age, is the best solution to stabilizing the planet for transition to space exploitation and colonization.

Attached: N.gif (183x170, 20.62K)

No. Nigger, you are wrong. Not that it matters to narcissistic nigger like yourself. But N words are many and none of them can harm a.person. are you implying niggers are not humans?

Only in your ontology, fren. In mine, and I would argue in most Americans’, placing limits on free speech is ontologically evil, as banning the n-word* is an attempt to place restrictions on allowable thought thus denying free will.

* ”nigger”

Attached: 8A1D0374-9EFE-446E-AD4A-138C47003E94.jpg (675x774, 441.81K)

you dont even know what ontologically means

How about just being decent fucking human beings that are respectful of other cultures and races?

Nigger

>mostly peaceful coexistence

Attached: Matteo_Tiratelli.2e16d0ba.fill-1200x630.jpg (1200x630, 127.88K)

"Ontologically evil"
Humans cannot be "ontologically" evil.

t. Church Fathers

You are not of ours.

Everything they say and do has to fit through a small window of plagiarized, ass backward mental gymnastics. None of us should be surprised, ontologically speaking of course.

(Checked)

Yes that is the point. The only way to accomplish what you propose is through an ethno-nationalist world which maximizes ethnic agency and responsibility. I'm glad you are coming around to ethno-nationalist anti imperial thinking.

In our religion we worship a god that genocides the planet for shits and giggles and invented women, of course we are evil
>*AHEM*
NIGGER!

How about those cultures and races act like human fucking beings first, then we can talk about respect. You tend to forget that respect is earned, not given.

Yes. This evil thing name is EVOLUTION. You do like the science, I guess.

>13/50
>coexisting peacefully

Attached: 1626816893903.png (306x306, 100.76K)

> ontologically evil
blargh
go outside stupid, stop fapping
blargh blargh muh blargh?

Attached: 21256963.jpg (235x188, 8.85K)

I think that is what OP was getting at subconsciously, is that niggers will nigga each other because dem evil niggas be niggin evil.

>Although I admire the freedom t
blargh blargh altoug pee pee i admire poo poo

Attached: 12586.jpg (474x311, 22.8K)

If only niggers could do that

They're reclaiming the word, it's not in your right to police them on it

What's wrong with wanting to live in an all white country nigger ?

Correct, they should police themselves in their own nation. Now you are thinking like an ethno-nationalist.

And what gives you the right to attempt to police us on it?

Search engine;

Talmud non-Jews

>just want to live in all-white countries
omg that would be so horrible haha imagine

Nor your right to police any words nigger

We don't have to destroy other races to have all White countries. They have their own countries and they have to go back.

Checked. And, as always, fpbp.

Attached: EB3DCBC6-3A29-4182-99DB-5D7E4EDB204C.gif (500x250, 1.04M)

if only
Hawaiitoast

Attached: 65215698.jpg (980x653, 84.87K)

Hawaiian rolls are the best

pretty cool that you can settle an ontological question simply by listening to certain sounds coming from a mouth, removed from context

as opposed to determining if something is evil from actions, like killing an unborn fetus or burning the town down or threatening a person's livelihood for ideological reasons

perhaps this claim of your proves communists have an IQ of sub 85 that are incapable of evaluating context and whom reduce everything to a single if... then statement.

Not gonna lie, that looks pretty good.

>They have their own countries and they have to go back.

You have to go back too, mutt.

why are so many subhumans talk all day?
like they have a talk assignment, wtf?
what is wrong with them?

Attached: 56598.jpg (640x615, 64.65K)

okay nigger

>It just shows you don't really care about coexisting peacefully
No, it demonstrates acknowledgment that niggers were never capable of peaceful coexistence even amongst themselves... take for example nigger on nigger crime, chicongo, and the melon-head rape capital of europe now thanks to Somaliand in Sweden. The a priori assumption that "racism" must be a spontaneous and irrational learned behavior is debunked.

>except Semitic genes
Get the jew dick out of your mouth, faggot.

Attached: 4.png (930x944, 209.38K)

it is a germn invention
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toast_Hawaii
bow down niggers, germans fucked Hawaii for the western world