Debating is a meme

ZOG/Communism/Leftists politics are not worth discussing. Might makes right and there are people who, for some reason, literally believe that if you grovel with some effeminate beta male in front of an audience for hours that its somehow based.

Attached: Tuco-Salamanca-1.jpg (1200x1054, 192.91K)

Bro is that Tony Montana?

Bonjour mr president what are you doing here

Attached: 1654262537799.jpg (1125x1048, 108.01K)

In that case anything goes. Just start killing them then and if you kill them all you win right?

Tuco from Breaking Bad

Political debates are also cringe in 2022

Not even advocating that but you're not wrong. People wouldn't argue in bad faith if duels were legal though.

Finally someone that gets it.

A dishwasher from Taco Bell

The problem is, anything goes. If they kill you, they were right. I don't know about you, user but if a tyranny jew kills everyone I don't think that makes them right. It makes them powerful, sure, but not right.

Correct. The time for dialogue is long gone.

Attached: D9CE9883-9973-491E-B813-59043F26AA78.jpg (626x808, 133.82K)

The question is, are you confident that you can kill them before they kill you?

Debate isn't done to "own the libs" it's done to convert the lurkers. Of course jews and glowies hate it.

Attached: youyouyou.jpg (640x357, 28.27K)

>Stop being persuasive and informative goy, just be violent like we want.

Attached: 1636779140035.png (557x371, 253.45K)

>dont fight back goy, just let them rape and kill you

Yup. Our biggest issue is too many right wingers who are either too comfortable or too retarded to understand this. A big problem is ways people cope to avoid the reality about their “friends and neighbors.” We’ve reached the point where outspoken leftists don’t mince words about wanting you dead and how much they hate everything about you. Conservatives in blue areas don’t get it though. Some are held hostage so badly that they’ll sooner attack us for speaking out just to keep the illusion that we all “agree on most things” or some other generic nonsense. I mean sure, the elites are totally pulling the strings, but running from the reality that there’s millions of everyday leftist whose only ideology is hating whites/Christians/conservatives is one of the reasons we lose.

Yes

Attached: 1653185410380.png (642x708, 1.2M)

Better get started then. Don't fuck it up.

>loser amerimutt wont fight back
Kek, not surprised. At least Europeans are Based unlike these mullato mongrel spic rapebaby called amerimutts

Attached: il duce.jpg (807x380, 28.39K)

Fuck yeah it is. Someone disagrees... sock that mother fucker until he/she stops talking. Based Tuco got all the answers, b.

no it isn't.
It's the long game.
A part of "Might" is in having more people on your team. Debate is one of the avenues to get people to agree with you.

The more people in society recognize that they benefit from your program, the mightier you are.

...i do not longer debate or complain, i just say what i have to say and good is ... i have no patient left for all the NPC shit the people are driven by!

>Might makes right
No, right makes right. Truth is truth.

based

Journalists are generally effeminate beta males with below 100 IQ. No point in discussing with them at all.

Lmao the thing is you wouldn't even have to. It's the reason debate is so stupid - you end up arguing with people you could easily physically destroy. Why waste the time, it only promotes them. If they try to take anything from you act in self defense. These talking heads won't throw hands

How's that long game going? What have conservatives conserved? Inb4 abortion, the public never supported it at large.

>How's that long game going? What have conservatives conserved?
conservatives aren't the only ones debating

>what are numbers
>what is warfare

You might be able to physically destroy a few but how many can you destroy until their words and debates provoke others to come kill you? Does that make them right?

Debating isn't about engaging with the other side honestly. It's a game to win the complacency of the masses. The complacency of the masses with violence from a certain group (for instance the establishment and police) is what allows for their tyranny. All debate is propaganda, those who win the debates gain implicit authority from the masses. First, from those interested spectators, the weak men of words that lack creativity; they then influence the uninterested masses through their roll as "smart" members of society.

Might isn't "right" because any given group that exerts might will immediately be overwhelmed by the general masses of all other groups; unless they first lay the ideological groundwork to induce complacency to their might in the general public. This wasn't always true, with early analog communication and information networks information moved slower and the predominant feedback mechanisms were different. Now in a digital world of effectively instantaneous mass communication complacency with a groups violence (also called "having authority") has to come first. The greatest might there is (the pen is mightier than the sword) is the ability to use "authority" to label your enemy and wield violence against them with the implicit consent of the masses. When the government says they killed a "terrorist" no one bats an eye.

Sheer force hasn't been the law of the land since the end of the 18th century, and certainly played almost no role since MAD.