What are the political implications of nuclear secrets leaked to the general public?

Attached: received_1233906760759013.jpg (2048x1536, 326.86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>le scifi mushroom cloudyboomy
you have to be 18 to post here

Bad. Unless nukes really are fake like some people shill here.

bad isnt a politcal stance

>shill here
what about Japan? Japanese are awfully silent on the subject of nukes and that Pearl Harbor thing .

Okay Any Forums
Top Secret Nuclear Files: need it or keep it??

>Japan
I am so fucking tired of China's California

not of note, really
the general design of a primitive weapon is already widely-known
multiple states, both friendly and not, understand the principles well, and have built weapons of varying complexity, and the materials and equipment needed to build one are under relatively close scrutiny
there's only been once instance of a non-state actor successfully building and testing one, and that was when Aum Shinrikyo nuked the Australian outback in 1993
this just helps anyone who can already build one to build a better one, which doesn't make the threat all that much greater
primitive or not, everything goes to shit if one goes off in a Western city; the crumbling of all veneer of civil and human rights, the end of all restraint placed on 'civilised' warfare
after the first, it won't stop at one, you see

no delete this now

Attached: AEAEAA5D-3B77-461F-BD55-E56913761785.gif (500x242, 563.29K)

it's the funniest lie ive heard them tell.

What are the political implications?

Why didn't he use newspaper lettering to leak it bros

Now the glowies will catch him by his handwriting

>
I'm sure some faggot is already 3d printing one as I type this.

>political implications

Nukes are old, Thermite on metal torus though. That right there is how you kill a planet in on blast

nukes aren't that hard to make

Not like anyone is gonna have the materials just hanging around to build one.

Attached: 1636273079523.jpg (810x611, 43.64K)

isn't this schematic literally on kikepidea?

Attached: 1659977339669065.gif (2046x1531, 3.99M)

This was all in some shitty 80s movie.

Amateurish crap any college student can find in their college library.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn

Nukes are fake.
Japan was firebombed.
Get over it.

Fun fact: the hardest part of building a nuclear weapon is building and running the enrichment facility. There is still no workaround for hundreds of centrifuges running together.

Some redneck figures out how to make a nuclear reactor out of old tractor parts, duck tape, and empties. The government decides to be an asshole and goes full Waco/Ruby Ridge on the dude.

they were already leaked though, like since the 90s Internet they were all over

It's probably another experiment to find out if someone voluntarily makes nuclear weapon or reactor

Takes a lotta money to make a nuke and chemistry expertise. Not something your average westoid can make at home. Maybe an Indian or Chinese can because they are high iq

People might do something dangerous like build a reactor to give a neighborhood free energy.

useless

if u have my nuke codes, and i have your nuke codes, would we be needing to destroy our own nukes?

there is no such thing as a nuclear secret
think about it for 2 fucking seconds
everyone has nukes
there are nukes fucking everywhere
every country with a half-baked science program can create nukes
the tech is almost a CENTURY old at this point

having nuclear secrets is like having fucking calculus secrets

what a fucking joke

There's nothing secret about this, it's well known how to make a nuclear device and weaponizing one is just taking it one step further. The issue is building one. Which requires an entire national defense industry and even then requires both the infrastructure, technocrats, funding and experience/expertise to pull off. And that is just for a simple device. Turning it into a weapon system requires a delivery vehicle which is an entire frontier unto itself.