If it was the jews that killed Jesus, why was it done with a Roman method of punishment?
Crucifixion was done by Romans
Other urls found in this thread:
Basically the story is that the Jewish priestly and rabbinical elites pressured the Roman governor to execute Jesus because Jesus was exposing them as corrupt to the public.
Kikes cried to have Jesus crucified. Read the Bible.
Read the gospels, chief. It's all there.
It was an occupied / conquered land and all justice went through the Romans. The Jews couldn't just kill him, they needed permission.
Done by the Romans and the Romans did it to prevent a jewish riot because the jewish clergy demanded it because the Christ was preaching against them.
you're not the sharpest bulb in the tool shed
in american law equivalency, the jew merchants where the prosecutors the jew sheeples the jury and the romans were the judge and the exectutioners.
Those digits
im checkin because its the right thing to do. amen.
Who gives a shit about some random semitic hippie loser from 2000 years ago?
jews were basically second class roman citizens, and it just so happened rome wanted influence over them so caesar pleased them
>Matthew 27:24-26
Why do you retards always ask questions about the Bible instead of just reading *checks notes* the Bible? All of the answers are in there you fucking pleb.
This is retarded at the time of the Neravarine the Nords wouldn't dare do a thing to Morrowind because it was protected by three living-gods and don't even get me started on Dagoth-ur
>hey you guys, if coffee comes from a bean then how is it a liquid?
Jews being Jews, they have others do the dirty work. Romans offered them up literal murderers instead for execution and the Jews turned them down.
except the Romans weren't particularly aware/had no reason to care about the religious intricacies involved.
It was like some kid comes in screaming at mommy and daddy that Timmy said (literally anything) and needs to be punished. And the mom or dad says "sure, whatever" just so the dumb kid will shut up for five minutes.
>it....It's was the Romans!
Yea after you disgusting kikes forced them to do so by chimping out
"let his blood be upon us and our children!"
I'll cut your head off
yet i played as a nord and this was exactly what happened
I, the white man, dont give a flying fuck about your desert losers. I dont care if they hate each other, they got nothing to do with me.
Wasn't Jesus operating in direct violation of Roman law though? Romans specifically allowed for people to worship whatever gods their so desired as long as they worshipped Roman gods as well. Jesus said only God alone was worthy of worship.
Romans themselves said he broke no laws
>Implying the Bible is an actual historical account
>Implying that it isn't full of contradictions
>Implying that is wasn't cobbled together by Romans in 325 AD
imagine being this retarded.
who are the pharasees? Also note, khazarites are the false jews mentions so it's all n/a.
Source?
the Bible dumbass
I hear this all the time. What exactly is real Jew?
>And he said unto them the third time,
Why, what evil hath he done? I have found no cause of death in him: I will therefore chastise him, and let him go.
>And they (kikes) were instant with loud voices, requiring that he might be crucified. And the voices of them and of the chief priests prevailed.
>And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they (kikes) required.
Actually God is god over all, including the Romans en.wikipedia.org
its quite obvious.
dawn rosenzweig is so hot
The Bible isn't a historical account. It was cobbled together by Romans in 325 AD during the first overseeing council of Nicaea during the reign of Emperor Constantine I; Where the Romans actually picked and chose what to put in and what to omit from the text which was made up entirely of second and third hand accounts. The only actual historical account of Jesus is in Annals written by Publius Cornelius Tacitus.
Kike slide thread. Kikes killed Jesus, it’s why they still hate him.
Bible verses aren't a reliable source of historical fact.
>be an openly seditious Jew
>storm the Temple courtyard with your band of Sicarii
>attack merchants
Yet christkikes would have us believe that the Romans were forced by the Jews to execute this criminal.
The romans carried it out to stop what they saw would otherwise be a Jewish rebellion
The guy even literally and physically washed his hands saying jesus blood would be on (((their))) hands
They accepted the terms
the jews wanted christs blood on their hands. the kike sanhedrin was offered to show mercy to jesus christ but they wanted his blood.
revelation says this (in red letters no less)
"write to the angel of the church in smyrna - thus says the first and the last, the one who was dead and came to life - i know your affliction and poverty, but you are rich. i know the slander of those who say they are jews and are not, but are a synagogue of satan
i know the slander of those who say they are jews and are not, but are a synagogue of satan
i know the slander of those who say they are jews and are not, but are a synagogue of satan
True in the sense of the term but Jesus was violating Roman law.
checked and probably true, but God gave us the bible, so whatever version survived today is the one he wills.
> Be a jew
> Worship mammon
> Detest all goyim
> Believe they are filthy animals destined for hell
> Mock their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
> Actually believe he is boiling in a vat of shit in hell
> Die
> Realize I'm in hell
> I'm not supposed to be here with these goyim!
> Wait a minute, there's been a mistake!
> Mfw
Nope, not according to the texts we have
The Mongols had guys specifically trained to slowly, gently run a 15-foot pike through your anus, being careful to travel through the guts but not to damage anything, and eventually the sharp end would come out your sternum. Then they'd set you and the pike on an angle and pound it into the ground, each shock echoing through your entire frame. Then they left you to die hanging like that. I've read that the Romans sometimes did this as well.
Christianity is a tool of Jewish supremacy...
They convince the Romans soldiers to become pacifists and love their enemy ( the Jews).
oh and only Jews can be bankers from now on. Christians can't do that any more so hand over control of the empires wealth to the Jews.
Why would the emperor agree ?
Well lets sweeten the deal and show that even God recognises Roman law and his only son is subject to the authority of the emperor and is executed on the cross.
Why would the Roman governor care about the blood of some seditious kike on his consciousness? Plenty of people were executed for less.
It's a very silly narrative.
How can you say that Bible verses aren't a reliable source of historical fact, but in the next breath use Bible verses to support your own false argument here ???
That didnt start to happen for another 100 years. When Romans saw that the new Jew religion was taking over the roman gods they tried to step in. Christianity was the ultimate underhanded Jew takeover of all time, and its not even fucking close.
>source
>writings of jews
The ancestors of the modern Jews, the pharisees that had Christ crucified cursed themselves and their own bloodlines (they put His blood in their hands and the hands of their children, who have to repent and accept Christ in order to save themselves). It's in the Bible:
Matthew 27:15-27
Of course a disgusting kike like you would say that because the book calls you out on everything you kikes do.
We know you kike, we have your number and God hates you.