Will there ever be a "bachelor" tax that is passed by congress? Since men aren't getting married...

Will there ever be a "bachelor" tax that is passed by congress? Since men aren't getting married, they are spending less and are also less productive.

Attached: 1660742461099877.jpg (346x674, 45K)

This thread will reach bump limit

The world is more productive than ever.
All the white men that built the machines have invented themselves useless and have given the means of production to jews.

They already do that in Germany.

only for cis white men

ok roastie

Attached: 1445631662219.png (538x307, 67.51K)

It already exists. Men pay more in taxes than they consume in services. Women are the opposite. Everything is about transferring wealth from men to women. Look at student loan "forgiveness". Women take out twice as many loans as men. "Forgiveness" would be men yet again bailing women out of their mess.

Stop posting this shit, we have this exact same thread every day multiple times a day. Any kind of potential discussion that could stem from this topic has already been discussed ad nauseam. These threads do nothing but draw demoralization trannies larping as Chads.

Dating opportunities for heterosexual men are diminishing as healthy at every size standards increase

Attached: 6312b0ab43eb8fc9.jpg (1267x1021, 108.08K)

What kind of "healthy relationship standards" would cause dating opportunities for heterosexual men to diminish?
I know they're probably referring to whores with their polyamorous "relationships" and fag couples, but I'm just giving them the benefit of the doubt I guess, wtf are they referring?

Reminder that under late roman patriarchy, Bachelorhood was illegal.

Newfags reply to thread that got posted 100 times in the last couple days every time.

Attached: 00F.jpg (500x487, 57.09K)

They mean things like women can have a job now and don't have to date guys that make less than the average of 60k a year now.

Women can go to college and don't have to date guys with high school diplomas anymore.

Women can travel now and don't have to date guys that never left their state before.

Women have standards now.

The economy is built upon womens spending. Men not getting married means less 50/50 divorce settlements meaning women spend less.

>Will there ever be a "bachelor" tax that is passed by congress?
If only you knew how bad things really are.

It means women are sick of your shit little boy

So why the fuck do they need men then?

Also

>Article written by a women

>Date

It was reviewed by a woman. It was written by a beta male psychologist. Simping for his female (obviously) patients. I mean, since women gained "independence" their mental health has been shit, so they all pay a shit ton to the mental health industry. He is probably a jew too.

>bachelor tax
Fucking. Fuck. Off.

>So why the fuck do they need men then?
To run and maintain pretty much everything. Stop listening to these bullshit articles being pushed to divide men and women.

There already is a bachelor tax. You're supposed to marry a hole and make her a home keeper and you can write off her standard deduction from your taxes.

This

If they already take what little men are making now, it'll be even more fucked. But indeed they are taking whatever they can.

So gay healthy standards are low? That's very homophobic of them

Dating apps are accelerating sexlessness. People under 30 think finding a date the old way is creepy, so men are funneled into a digital landscape where 90% of them are filtered out right off the bat.

Oh look, it's THIS thread again. I think you know what I'm gonna do :^)

Then why would you support a bachelor tax?

>bachelor tax
no
>gov mandated hood rat girlfriends
yes

yeah you're right, it's probably that.
nothing to do with the fact that asking a girl for her number can get you a sexual harassment charge now.