We could easily split water with atomic fusion and use the compressed hydrogen to zoom around at Mach 3. Calcium is would be fantastic H2 source. Just add water and off you go. Why isn't anybody talking about this? When atomic hydrogen (as in mono-atomic) recombines into diatonic form It releases more energy than is put in. Above unity. Knowledge of this fact is subtly shrouded in complex language but it's true. It's even printed on the plaque we put on the moon.
Populate the stars
Ian Garcia
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
files.catbox.moe
twitter.com
Aaron Campbell
> When atomic hydrogen (as in mono-atomic) recombines into diatonic form It releases more energy than is put in.
Sounds like you’ve got a perpetual motion machine then. Why are you posting about it here instead of getting rich off it faggot?
Easton Young
This is why.
youtu.be
Where do you think all this energy and matter came from? A dying universe? Open your eyes.
Justin Miller
We don't have the material science to survive space travel.
Also, what you're describing is a hydrogen bomb, not something that can be harnessed by a steel fuel tank.
t. ME
Owen Russell
How the fuck do you think the Atomic submatines run? Uranium?
Luke Butler
No. A hydrogen bomb is explosive fission. This is a very very low energy form of fusion.
Josiah Anderson
Jesus you’re retarded. An H bomb is fusion primarily, that’s what the fucking H means.
Juan Fisher
It's the same technology that is in the lightbulb. Tungsten. Hydrogen.
Michael Thomas
Little investment tip for anyone interested, you should look into sun hydrogen HYSR. Company is making nanomachines to split water into hydrogen. I have nearly 100k shares of this company, it's currently trading at .04usd. basically, if this tech takes off, getting rich would be easy and we can be the pioneers of this technology. Anyways, cool things are gonna happen someday with hydrogen to replace oil
Caleb Perez
OK dude. If you call smashing deuterium and lithium into Helium "fusion" then fine. Atomic hydrogen is simply the recombination of the atomic radical into the diatomic molecule. No smashing involved.
Nicholas Barnes
Are they using titanium oxide? It's a cool technology, also supressed but not sure it's patentable. The good stuff is all pre-ipo and working with DOE.
Carson Jones
Glow niggers on the phone rn.
Parker Flores
It's all hidden in the gibberish. ALso know the "finite element method." A fake branch of math meant to hide classified science and technology from the normies in plain site.
Lincoln Mitchell
How do you control a minor amount of atomic fusion to split hydrogen from water in a way a mechanical or chemical engine can produce propulsion in a vacuum? I like your enthusiasm not trying to be a pessimist.
Juan Kelly
Really have no clue, I just knew investing in hydrogen is probably a good idea for my retirement plans. They are supposed to have some prototype results by the end of the year.
Ian Lewis
you heat CA enough it turns to calcium carbide, which when added to water produces acetylene. If you heat calcium even further you can split off the oxygen molecule and you get soft cheese like metal (calcium). When this is added to water the water molecule splits and the calcium is oxidized. The remaining H2 bubbles out. NOW...How can we use the hydrogen gas as a propulasive fuel? Much the same way we use jet fuel or we can excite it with electricity to create an ion beam of jet. This energy produces thrust. this is how we landed on the moon. You can also use halogens like iodine, chlorine for the ions. What I don know is the technology to produce "free energy" is there. It's calleed atomic energy and doesn't have to be dangerious or dirty. They want it that way for a reason. It's about control and money. Same reason LSD is illegal and hearing aids require prescription.
Luke Rodriguez
Buy $LIN - it's safer and it's a monopoly. Picks and shovels ny man.
Cooper Baker
Fusion? Or Fission?
Oliver Diaz
Forget the fusion for a minute. We could just burn the hydrogen in place of gasoline. And we can get the hydrogen from salt fusion reactors. Safe. Cheap as fuck. They want you plugged in.
Michael Baker
Not really either. Has elements of fusion in that the exitation of H at it's base state produces excess energy, except you can use plain old dry hydrogen and don't need deuterium. Just electricity and tungsten.
Isaac Reyes
>split water with atomic fusion
?
splitting water is a chemical reaction, not a nuclear reaction. You might use fusion power to decompose water into H2 and O2, but now what?
>calcium would be a fantastic H2 source
?
Calcium? Calcium hydride? Calcium hydroxide? What properties make calcium a good H2 source? And what do you do with the H2? You can't fuse it as is.
>just add water and off you go
?
No idea what this means.
>recombination of hydrogen to form dihydrogen releases energy
Only thing you've said that isn't retardedly wrong or nonsensical, but it has nothing to do with fusion. It takes the same amount of energy to break apart the H-H bond as it releases when it forms.
Jaxson Reed
The speed at which it oxidizes in water is relatively slow. controlled vs say sodium or potassium. It's plentifull and it's cheap.
Xavier Green
I know. It is nonsensical. It's a mystery why this happens. But it does. This effect was discovered by Irving Langmuire in early 1900s. A lot of effort goes into confusing and hiding this fact. A lot a lot.
Landon Wilson
I have a PhD in surface science. Recombination of hydrogen into dihydrogen is not a fusion reaction. Catalytic surface-mediated decomposition of dihydrogen into adsorbed hydrogen can occur, but there is no path toward fusion to form helium unless you invoke wildly incoherent theories of low-energy nuclear reactions in the bulk (cold fusion).
It's just not gonna happen.
Jacob Ramirez
Agreed.