And she's still gonna get elected anyway because all the libruls are gonna vote for her LMAO
She's just gonna run as an independent
dumb foid
She won't even make it onto the stage at the first primary debate.
how the fuck do you solve the new captcha guys?
She can’t, dumbass. Look up “sore loser law”. Picrel
We did it Trump sisters!
>bladdra ingen fil ar vald
Pfff hahahaha other languages are so fucking retarded.
Oh and to answer your question, I don't know. Just reset it and get another one, that's what I usually do if I can't solve it.
Would they really vote for Cheney over Lynette GreyBull, the actual Democratic nominee?
Slide the circle
That's how Murkowski got elected in Alaska. Look it up.
>leftypol retard
the second runner up republican could beat liz heads up in WY, the cheneys are over
Is she related to Betty Greybull?
That's incredibly retarded
After you type in your comment, you hit "Get Captcha", then you slide the circle around until recognizable numbers/letters form, type them in, hit post, and then your comments will appear....
Heyyyy.......
That would be delicious.
>libs
>in Wyoming
It says she can't be nominated by petition. Does that that mean she can't run independent? Or she can't get on a party ticket?
Every single woman and college age kid.
The wording is ambiguous enough that any good lawyer can get her on the ballot or even homologate a write-in victory.
Yeah, but Murkowski has been steering federal money into Alaska by the tankerload for decades. Alaska basically lives off gibs. Also, it was a write-in campaign (which is almost unheard of in the Senate and required under Alaska law). By contrast, nobody has gibs in play with Cheney and I doubt you could convince Dems to write Cheney in. I just can’t see it. Maybe if it were 49.9% to 50.1% but the Republican base will not be having any more of her bullshit.
Basically now her name cannot appear on the general election ballot. In theory she could run a write-in campaign (as Murkowski did), but this is unlikely due to unique circumstances really only found in Alaska (see )
Democrats have tried centrist spoiler candidates before and it usually splits their own Democratic vote. Much of the Democratic Party is still wealthy old white people who won’t mind crossing the aisle to vote for an anti-Republican independent, while the GOP base will usually stay firm with the Republican candidate.
Democrats need farther right candidates to split the GOP vote successfully, like Libertarian candidates or Ross Perot types
>Lynette GreyBull,
idk but Palantine RedBull has my vote. Damn good crack energy
You got to use the slider at the bottom, and after you think you got it right, you will fail about 3 or 4 times. Enjoy!
>She's just gonna run as an independent
and she will get rekt and we will all have another laugh at a dumb cunt that thinks it is important.
WELL, you see in academia as well as part of insular politifal science circles, that is, where people accurately analyze emergent political dogma and its adherants application in direct practice, such a voting outcome is possible when looked through the long lens of Trump and see him holding the sign that says.... SCHLONGED