Why does Any Forums call British people Anglos when the Saxons were exterminated and Norman's are the ones who live in...

Why does Any Forums call British people Anglos when the Saxons were exterminated and Norman's are the ones who live in Britain now?

Attached: 882646271ce9c4164d210707c5150590.jpg (428x640, 74.73K)

learn how dynasties in medieval Europe worked.

Oh no, yet another American with a barely recognisable grasp of history not rooted in reality whatsoever, what a surprise

>when the Saxons were exterminated and Norman's are the ones who live in Britain now
Well that didn't happen so your point is invalid. Anglo-Saxons became a serf class subservient to a Franco-Norman nobility. They were still the overwhelming majority hence why the English language for example is basically Anglo-Saxon with some French/Latin vocalubary added on top.

But genealogy has revealed that only about a third of white brits are Saxon and most of them Norman

So, the Saxons were not exterminated then. Good thread

They basically were. British people have more Norman DNA than Saxon.

So they were not exterminated then

Lol yeah they were. Britain is ruled by Norman's. That's like saying the Indians weren't exterminated.
Why does that make you seethe so hard did I bump an antivaxx thread off the catalog?

why is it always the mongrel that obsesses the most about ethnic purity?

I'm not really concerned with the purity here. If I were though I'd say that you are probably part mongoloid

where the celts exterminated as well?

absolute nonsense

Source: Your Amerimutt ass

Non-Saxon DNA is likely Briton considering the Anglo-Saxons invaded Roman Britain, took the coasts, raped the Britons there, then the Anglo-Briton rapebabies went further inland, took what is modern England plus southern Scotland but minus Cornwall and created a second generation of rapebabies which means English DNA is about 60-70% Briton.

Normans DNA is marginal and even harder to track due to the fact that they, like the original Saxons, also have strong Germanic admixture from the Franks, Saxons(forcibly settled there by Charlemagne) and Danes that settled the region.

No. Ireland is such a stinky underdeveloped boghole full of crazy cultists that it wasn't until later that Christian Missionaries went there.
That's why Irish are so distinct from mainlanders.

>They basically were. British people have more Norman DNA than Saxon.
You just moved your goal post.

your average brit is a mix of fucking celt, saxon, then viking, then norman and so on...

Norman's are directly descended from Danes through Rollo who founded Normandy. So when people talk about Germanic blood in England that's what they are talking about.

Barely any Normans invaded, maybe 10,000 if that. A third of the Norman army were mercenaries from Brittany who are brythonic Celts like the welsh/cornish. They basically killed off or drove out the Anglo-saxon elites and that's it.

The English lower and middle classes are all pretty much an even mix of Anglo, Britton, and Norman
Upper classes are all still mostly German and Norman, although now they are Plaki too kek

Attached: 1576944597273.jpg (1024x903, 70.42K)

I just read a whole bigass thing about how raiders led by Rollo settled the northern coast of France and started a dynasty and William the Conquerer was his great great grandson.

he literally learned hist history from The Vikings™

Attached: ae5QZjv_460s.jpg (460x345, 29.17K)

>So when people talk about Germanic blood in England that's what they are talking about.
Retard. One Germanic lineage doesn't automatically invalidate all the other, especially when the minor Danish genetic impact on the Normans was even more marginal in the English.

The Rollo in Vikings is completely made up retard. I'm talking about a different Rollo.

Brits got a lot of wop in them. Homosexuality is a Med thing. It ain't white.

you realise that
>normans
are not all descendants of Rollo and his war-party buddies?