Human evolution has been determined by the environment humans lived in...

Human evolution has been determined by the environment humans lived in. Colder climates required longer term thinking which is why in places like Europe and Asia, the Northerners are smarter. However, urbanization took away this genetic pressure by providing safety nets which allowed the subpar to survive and reproduce. To stop humanity from devolving, you have four options:

1) Forcefully stop some people from breeding.
2) Get people with good genes to breed a lot more
3) Genetically engineer humans
4) End modern civilization entirely

If you choose none, option four happens automatically because we won't be able to sustain modern civilization. Which options do you choose?

Attached: 1505664168617.png (654x751, 612.7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=i4dypyJ9BuU
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The existence of Russia deboonks your theory

Rent free.
2) is the most humane option, with a bit of 1).

You have to go back

Dude they already killed the vaxxed, it's eugenics the genome get's smarter.

But I'm not Samurai Jack.

We're already in the middle of (3) while "the right" are proposing to adopt (4)

Seems like the rise of classical civilization also debunks this.

Long ago in a distant thread.
I, user, didn't seethe at Russians because twitter told me to
But, a foolish Austrian warrior wielding zero rent stepped forth to oppose me.

>while "the right" are proposing to adopt (4)
While "the left" are vaxxing themselves to death.